Answer:
interest expense for the first semiannual interest period and subsequent: 3,965.3 dollars
Explanation:
face value 94,000
proceeds 91,947
discount 2,053
under straight-line method the discount amortization will be equally distributed among the payment
2,053 / 10 payment dates = 205.3
Then, we have to add the cash outlay in favor of the bondholders:
94,000 face value x 8% coupon rate / 2 payment per year = 3,760
Total interest expense: 3,760 + 205.3 = 3,965.3
The return of equity will increase. Businesses can finance
themselves with debt and equity capital. By aggregating the quantity of debt
capital kin to its equity capital, a company can increase its return on equity.
The way in which rising financial leverage increases ROE is a
little less instinctive. One way to think about it is that if a business
adds debt, its assets increase for the reason that its
cash inflows from the debt issuance and so does its
entire debt.
Answer:
$11,230
Explanation:
The city of Springvale imposed a net income tax on all businesses
Each business will make a payment of 1% for any amount up to $100,000 and 1.5% for any amount above $100,000
The net income generated by Springvale Bar and Grill is
= $782,000- $100,000
= $682,000
Therefore, it's city income tax is calculated as follows
(1/100+100,000) + ( 1.5/100+682,000)
( 0.01+100,000) + ( 0.015+682,000)
= 1000 + 10,230
= $11,230
Hence, Springvale Bar and Grill will pay a net income tax of $11,230
Be realistic
Aim for sticking to your budget most of the time, and you’re bound to reach your financial goals. Breaking your budget occasionally is OK, providing you get right back on track as soon as possible.
Answer: incidental beneficiary
Explanation:
An incidental beneficiary refers to an individual who isn't a party to a contract but later becomes a third party beneficiary who is unintended to the contract.
It should be noted that the incidental beneficiary has no rights that are enforceable under the contract. With regards to the question, Jim suffered losses as a result, but he had no rights in the contract because he was an incidental beneficiary.
