Answer:
are
Explanation:
because i saiiiiiddd sooo-
The correct answer is D. man vs. man
.
In <em>The Most Dangerous Game</em>, Zaroff places Rainford in a situation where Rainsford is the prey and Zaroff is the predator.
Zaroff has no problem with hunting humans while Rainsford thinks of it as murder.
In <em>The Cask of Amontillado</em>, the main themes are revenge, betrayal and madness. The narrator feels so persecuted by Fortunato’s mockery that he decides to make a psychopathic plan to kill him.
Answer:
I have a few ideas:
<u>If</u><u> </u><u>you</u><u> </u><u>do</u><u> </u><u>kill</u><u> </u><u>him</u><u> </u><u>off</u><u>:</u>
- You can kill him off, but the guy who made him immortal can change his mind and revive him.
- He could just die, and that could be the end of it.
- Alternatively, the guy who made him immortal can remove the ability without killing him.
<u>If you don't kill him off:</u>
- He could be shown a new purpose in life, where he can use his powers of immortality for the good of humanity.
- The immortality can be removed, but there will be a major cost, and the guy might soon regret giving up his abilities.
- You can have the guy who made him immortal, refuse to do anything about the situation.
- Or you can also make him "agree to do it" but never ends up doing it. (This can cause more interesting things to occur between, both the immortal guy and the guy who made him immortal. Such as the guy finding ways to cope with his immortality, the immortal guy loathing the guy who turned him immortal, and even the guy who made the other one immortal, promising "to make things right" even though he's not planning to keep his word.)
Hope this helps you friend :)
And if you want more ideas, hmu in comments or something.
I think the answer is full of sorrow .