Answer:
C. Debit Cash $1, 385: credit sales $1, 300: credit Cash Over and Short $85.
Explanation:
Based on the information given The proper entry to account for this excess is:
Debit Cash $1,385
Credit Sales $1,300
Credit Cash Over and Short $85
($1,385-$1,300)
Answer: indemnification
Explanation: The indemnification clause is essentially the other party's obligation to compensate your damages if they do something that hurts you or allows you to be sued by a third party.
Indemnifying and keeping innocent means the same thing — making it whole after a defeat. Usually, but not always, the obligation to indemnify is reconcilable with the contractual obligation to "keep harmless" or "save harmless.
Hence from the above we can conclude that Rangle has right of indemnification.
Answer:
The expected return on Bo's complete portfolio will be "10.32%".
Explanation:
The given question is incomplete. Please find attachment of the complete question.
According to the question, the given values are:
Port's expected return,
T-bill's expected return,
Port's weight,
T-bill's weight,
Now,
The Bo's complete portfolio's expected return will be:
⇒ 
On substituting the given values, we get
⇒ 
⇒ 
Note: percent = %
Answer: <em><u>Developers can spend $55316.9</u></em>
Explanation:
EAR =![[e^{Annual percentage rate} -1]\times 100](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Be%5E%7BAnnual%20percentage%20rate%7D%20-1%5D%5Ctimes%20100)
Effective Annual Rate=
Effective Annual Rate% = 9.42
![PV_{Ordinary Annuity} = C\times [\frac{(1-(1+\frac{i}{100} )^{-n} )}{(i/100)} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PV_%7BOrdinary%20Annuity%7D%20%3D%20C%5Ctimes%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281-%281%2B%5Cfrac%7Bi%7D%7B100%7D%20%29%5E%7B-n%7D%20%29%7D%7B%28i%2F100%29%7D%20%5D)
where;
C = Cash flow per period
i = interest rate
n = number of payments
![PV = 3500\times [\frac{(1-(1+\frac{9.42}{400} )^{-5\times 4} )}{(9.42/400)} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PV%20%3D%203500%5Ctimes%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281-%281%2B%5Cfrac%7B9.42%7D%7B400%7D%20%29%5E%7B-5%5Ctimes%204%7D%20%29%7D%7B%289.42%2F400%29%7D%20%5D)
PV = $55316.9
Answer:
The answer is: the ordering cost will be $38
Explanation:
We have the formula for economic order quantity is:
EOQ = Square root of ( 2 x S x D / H)
in which: S ordering cost;
D: Quantity demand
H: carrying cost
For the law office to act at optimal level by ordering EOQ at 65 units a time, The ordering cost will be found be the equation:
65 = square root of ( 2 x S x 245 / 4.4) <=> 4,225 = (2 x S x 245) / 4.4 <=> 4,225 = 1225S/ 11 <=> S = $38
Thus, the ordering cost will be $38.
