A scientific argument is when it had more examples of that certain argument. What I’m saying is that scientific arguments have more details and more evidence to why that answer is wrong or right. Regular arguments is when it is less detailed and just making predictions and theoretical analysis. (Hope this helps)
The main reason why the Continental Congress was unable to fix the economic crisis after the American Revolution was because they had no power to tax the states--meaning that they could not repay the nation's war debts.
Answer:
The spanish-American war was a humanitarian endeavor.
Explanation:
<span>- Increase minimum wage
- National health insurance - not implemented
- Expand public housing
- Expand social security - 1950 law added previously excluded self-employed and
domestic workers to Social security
- Expand aid to education
- Private welfare arrangements thrived: labor contracts of unionized workers established
health insurance plans, automatic cost of living wage increases, paid vacations, and pension plans that supplemented social security</span>
<span><span>1.
</span>So the country could borrow in the future</span>
<span><span>2.
</span>To support Americans business</span>
<span><span>3.
</span>The democratic republic believed that the bank
would help finance wars</span>
<span><span>4.
</span>He halted all trade with Europe</span>
<span><span>5.
</span><span>Claim that states had the right to determine
the constitutionality of a law </span></span>
<span><span>6.
</span>the purchase of the Louisiana territory</span>
<span><span>7.
</span><span>It provided a buffer between the United States </span></span>
<span> </span>
