The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
For most Christians, Good Friday is the remembrance of Jesus Christ's suffering and death on the cross.
B. A recession period. This problem can be solved in two ways. The first would be to group the answers by their relationship with the economy, A, C, and D are all periods of economic growth. B. is the only one that identifies with stagnation or a negative period of growth. The second option is to identify the reason behind tax cuts during a recession. Tax cuts reduce expenditures for all economic parties involved, except for the government, which would increase the national debt, but the attempt is to stimulate the economy like President Ronald Reagan did with tax cuts during the 1980s, later accepting some increases in taxes after the economy started to expand.
Answer:
cold
Explanation:
because the could has less friction and more slippery
