Answer:
The study of governmental structures must be approached with great caution, for political systems having the same kind of legal arrangements and using the same type of governmental machinery often function very differently. A parliament, for example, may be an important and effective part of a political system; or it may be no more than an institutional facade of little practical significance. A constitution may provide the framework within which the political life of a state is conducted; or it may be no more than a piece of paper, its provisions bearing almost no relationship to the facts of political life. Political systems must never be classified in terms of their legal structures alone: the fact that two states have similar constitutions with similar institutional provisions
hope this helps :D
Explanation:
The American civil war. The south is the blue, the north is red. The south didn’t need to capture any Northern Territory, whereas the north wanted to take over the south so that they could keep the states united, hence the Union.
Used wampum belts to conduct trade: Pequot
Were part of the Iroquois Confederacy: Mohawk
Engaged in a war with settlers in South Carolina: Yamasee
The rights of dalits or lower-caste Indians was changed as the constitution banned the discrimination based on caste.
<h3>What is the
Dalits right about?</h3>
The discrimination of the Dalits right includes a violation to their various rights before the law
However, this dicrimination was changed as the India constitution banned the discrimination based on caste.
Therefore, the Option B is correct
Read more about Dalits right
<em>brainly.com/question/11707391</em>
There are four If you remember the old acronym MAIN.
M-Militarism
A-Aliances
I-Imerialism
N-Nationalism
