Ways it was divided: Indeed, it would be hard to argue that the country is more divided now than it was during the Civil War and in fact, the familiar proscription against discussing politics and religion in general company appeared at least as far back as a book of etiquette entitled Hill’s Manual of Social and Business Forms published in 1879. And it could certainly be said that our current political unrest has nothing on the 1960s. Consequently, part of today’s apparent divisiveness appears to be a matter of short-sighted perspective
Ways it is divided today: Noting the relationship between negative campaigning and press coverage, the study authors wrote that “negative (but not positive) messages are recycled ad infinitum by journalists who seek conflict and controversy above all else” and that “technology has facilitated citizens’ ability to seek out information sources they find agreeable and tune out others that prove dissonant.” In other words, campaign muckraking appears to increase affect polarization, while press coverage of that conflict fans the flame of confirmation bias.
"Can the United States Become More United Again?": If there is hope for Americans to move forward together as a country, it lies in the promise that democracy can bring those from different cultures and disparate viewpoints to the same table where they can work collaboratively based on a larger shared identity and the greater common good. Much of what we know, or think we know, about political polarization is based on polls and surveys that force respondents into dichotomous choices that may fail to capture the complexity of how people actually feel. In reality, many partisans have more nuanced views than one might assume, just as apparent “moderates” might have extreme opinions that are inconsistent with a unified party platform and therefore "cancel each other out"
Hope this helps! Good luck! I added the last one just as a bonus answer!
The answer is D leaders do not have the right to oppress their people
The First Industrial Revolution, which initiated in Britain, in 1750, happened due to several factors that favored its boom and growth. The first of the many factors was the happening of the Agricultural Revolution of the 18th century, which led to a surplus production of foodstuffs. This meant that people had more money to spend in things that were not the acquirement of basic needs, like food. Another issue was that there was a great increase in the population numbers and many farmers began to migrate towards places where they could find work in factories and new industries. Also, because of the successful English revolutions of the 17th century there was an economic and financial boom, also given by the increased sales of cotton and other crops that were traded. This meant that there was further injection of funds to the creation of factories. Finally, two other factors were the vast presence of mineral resources, such as coal to feed the industries and which could be transported easily, and the second, the empowerment and creation of financial institutions which led to easier access to funds for the creation of new factories. From the options given, then, the only one that does NOT explain a factor is A: low population density. All other options were factors that aided in the success of the Industrial Revolution in England.
Answer:
1. Notable means prominent
2. Prestigious means honored or esteemed
3. Rendered means to present for consideration
Explanation:
I'm good at vocab lol
The answer is D. He delivered his speech during the March on Washington.