This may not be the best but here’s how I would do it.
Counterclaim #1:
Some would argue that women should not be allowed to serve combat positions in the United States military because they don't possess the strength requirements
for difficult tasks.
Evidence #1: (This section looks good I think)
According to the text, "The Army's
own research indicates that the vast
majority of women do not possess
the lean mass necessary to meet the
strength requirements for very heavy
and heavy physical tasks"
(Fredenberg 5).
Despite the fact that women do lack the strength requirements for very heavy physical tasks, they should still be allowed to serve combat positions in the United States military. When in groups with men, they raise the team's collective intelligence which improves combat performance in the United States military.
Note: These are just my suggestions. This isn’t final. You may make adjustments accordingly. Hope you find this somewhat helpful. Good luck.
Answer: A. Editor
B. Readers
C. Publish
Explanation:Once an author submits his or her paper to a journal, editor evaluate the paper. If they determine that it may be a good candidate for publication, the paper is sent to several experts, or readers, for review. If an editor agrees with their recommendation to publish the paper, the editor and author work together to revise the paper for publication, usually based on feedback from the referees.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
they should be equally prioritized
He really wants to tell the secret but he knows he cant but like a ticking time bomb eventually itll spill
C. The most important events and rules
PS also the people involved
