Hmm I would think its Either the 2nd or 3nd one in my opinion.
The best critique that should make Henrique to revise the paraphrase is Some descriptive language should be added by Henrique to make the story to be so alive.
<h3>What is the summary of the story?</h3>
The story of the story is to talk about the way the soldiers acted when they were made to face the dragon.
From the story, they were on a trip to face the dragon. But the story did not tell the complete details about the encounter.
<h3>Complete story</h3>
The soldiers walked through the rain as they approached the canyon. They'd been traveling for days to reach the dragon's lair. Finally they arrived. Then the dragon approached, and it roared. Yet, the soldiers faced off with the dragon, despite the noise.
Your Question: Which is the best critique explaining why Henrique should revise the summary?
Read more on excerpts here:
brainly.com/question/21400963
#SPJ1
Answer:
Plants and Animals are the two main sources of food.
Answer:
A. trained doctors, physical therapists, and certified trainers
Explanation:
When you're listing three or more things, you should separate them with a comma. The last two words that make up the list should be connected by a conjunction, usually <em>and </em>or <em>or</em>. That conjunction should also be preceded by a comma. This type of comma is called an oxford comma, and its purpose is to make the sentence clear, unambiguous, and understandable.
Based on this information, we can conclude that the correct answer is option A.
Common noun now if u say grandpa Rick that would be proper
