Answer:
No. In an 8-1 decision authored by Chief Justice Morrison Waite, the Court concluded that the relevant sections of the Enforcement Act lacked the necessary, limiting language to qualify as enforcement of the Fifteenth Amendment. The Chief Justice first stated that the Fifteenth Amendment "does not confer the right of suffrage upon any one," but "prevents the States, or the United States, however, from giving preference…to one citizen of the United States over another on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." In examining the language of the Enforcement Act, the Court noted that, while the first two sections of the act explicitly referred to race in criminalizing interference with the right to vote, the relevant third and fourth sections refer only to the "aforesaid" offense. According to the Court, this language does not sufficiently tailor the law to qualify as "appropriate legislation" under the Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
Answer: C
Explanation: I would say that it's a significant role for government in the running of the economy.
Answer:They hoped to break the stalemate by successfully conquering No Man's Land. These vehicles are very strong and durable to withstand gunfire from enemy personnel.
Explanation:
To make the Indians starve or move away
Answer:
a writ of certiorari
Explanation:
To request the records of a prior case for review and possible reconsideration, the Supreme Court of the United States issues "a writ of certiorari."
This is done following the approval of at least four justices who issue a writ of certiorari, authorizing the lower court to send the Supreme Court the record of the case for review.
