1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ANEK [815]
2 years ago
10

Why did Britain not act to stop Hitler breaking the treaty of versailles​

History
1 answer:
rjkz [21]2 years ago
8 0
Answer:However the British people felt that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair on Germany and was over-restrictive, and so partly because of this, the British government decided to do nothing.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did the settlement of the west affect the relationship between the north and the south? what did this lead to?
Thepotemich [5.8K]
PLZ GIVE mE options m8

7 0
3 years ago
Select all that apply
spayn [35]
1 2 3 5 are correct for this problom
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following describes the change of trade between Japan and the United States since World War II?
Lisa [10]
The correct answer is C. It has grown since the war was over but the growth was insignificant.
4 0
3 years ago
How did nationalism contribute to global conflicts following world war 1
sergij07 [2.7K]

Answer: Gandhi Ji came back from South Africa and let to major awakening among the common people.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
A person who is not satisfied with an appellate court’s decision can take the case to another state’s court. can take the case t
Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

C. can take the case to a higher court.

Explanation:

An appellate court is also known as court of appeals and can be defined as a court of law of the judicial system that is empowered by law (jurisdiction) and saddled with the responsibility of hearing and reviewing an appeal of a trial-court or other lower court (tribunal).

This ultimately implies that, all appellate courts are empowered by law to review both questions of fact and questions of law. The appellate court can review questions of law as "De novo" or plenary review (legal error standard).

Hence, a person who is not satisfied with an appellate court’s decision can take the case to a higher court. This simply means that, when a person loses a court case decided by an appellate court, trial court or other lower courts (tribunal); he or she has the fundamental or basic rights to appeal the verdict in a federal appellate court of competent jurisdiction or even the supreme court.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Ellen does an experiment by releasing a ball from a height of 1 m above each floor in a tall building. She records the time it t
    9·2 answers
  • What does the table reveal about U.S. dependence on foreign oil since 1990?
    13·1 answer
  • To group the program Johnson created into
    9·1 answer
  • In what document are these "unalienable rights" specifically mentioned?
    9·2 answers
  • Of the 7,400 telephone customers in the New York–New Jersey area in 1891, the majority were_______.
    10·1 answer
  • Mao zedong is best known for:
    11·1 answer
  • Who is the First prime ministers of America​
    14·2 answers
  • How long did the witch-hunts continue
    12·1 answer
  • The excerpt provided is in response to what action by the U.S. Government?
    9·1 answer
  • Very confused i need help finding the continents and countries for EACh
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!