The U.S Supreme Court pronounced the balancing test in the Turner v. Safley case. The balancing test means that the courts must balance the rights of inmates against the penological concerns of security and order.
In this case, the U.S Supreme Court upheld broad restriction on inmate-to-inmate correspondence and, in the process, reaffirmed its commitment to a deferential standard in prisoner speech cases.
In Justice O’Connor’s opinion in Turner v. Safley, he identified four factors to consider when applying this standard:
- Whether or not there is a valid, rational link between the regulation and the governmental interest advanced to justify it;
- Whether inmates are left with alternative means of exercising the right that the regulation restricts;
- Whether accommodating the asserted right would have a significant ripple effect on fellow inmates or prison staff;
- And whether there is a ready alternative to the regulation that fully accommodates the asserted right at a minimal cost to valid penological interests.
To know more about penology here-
brainly.com/question/28043931
#SPJ4
Answer:
None, this not an unethical behaviour
Explanation:
Andy's behaviour is unethical as it does not promote the principles of ethical leadership which are respect, service, community, honesty and justice neither does it promote altruism. He acted in a self-centered and egotistic manner.
Answer:
Actor/observer bias
Explanation:
In psychology, the actor/observer bias refers to the tendency to attribute our own actions to external causes while attributing other people's behaviors to internal causes.
When the results of a situation are negative, if the negative outcome happened to the person, the person will likely attribute the outcome to external circumstances. But when it comes to other people, the person will attribute the outcome to the other person behaviors, habits or actions.
In this example, Jeremiah falls and thinks the ice is brutal. <u>He is attributing the fall to an external circumstance (the ice)</u>. But then, when his friend Ed falls on the same spot, he says his friend is really clumsy, <u>attributing the fall to an inner characteristic of his friend</u>. Therefore, this would be an example of actor/observer bias.
Every fundamental right also contains some exceptions for example the right to equality says that the state should make special provisions for women and children, scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and backward classes
Answer:
Its important to learn history because it helps us understand our future and know what to do. Sources of history try a history book or history class
Explanation:
