The sacred texts of Buddhism are called the...

1 answer:

6 0

Answer:

D. Tripitaka

Explanation :

The Buddhist canon consists of the Sutras: the words and teachings of the Buddha. The Tripitaka (Pali Canon), Mahayana Sutras and the Tibetan Book of the Dead are three major noncanonical Buddhist texts.

You might be interested in

How many justices serve on a supreme court

kari74 [83]

Answer:

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

What Mongol leader is best known as a patron of the arts?

aev [14]

The mongol leader that is best known as a patron of the arts is Kublai Khan

He was the fifth Khagan of the Mongol empire, leading it from 1260 - 1294. He is the first mongol Khagan who initiate the development of arts within Asian Region

6 0

3 years ago

How did soviet agriculture harm the aral sea?

arsen [322]

It dried it up due to irrigation

4 0

3 years ago

The straw man fallacy occurs when the arguer presents an extreme version of the opposing position in order to make it easier to

kirill115 [55]

Answer:

answer is given below

Explanation:

They are attacking immigrants from a personal point of view.
Stewart and Hodgman use the straw man fallacy to make their case more solid. They explain that immigrants are dangerous people who bring violence and sickness, then they change positions and show how innocent the hosts are and are not eligible for the programs that immigrants bring.
Yes, they use common beliefs. If the leprosy epidemic erupts, it will most likely endanger Americans' fingers. Or comments that shock Americans on leprosy in America. But we have to remember that this show is a comedy. The chart shown is certainly not for any decision. The facts are not correct for cases of leprosy.
Stewart and Hodgman rightly criticize the general and the hypocritical and hypocritical about immigration. This problem is exaggerated because it is founded on American immigrants and the general belief that the majority of politicians like Newt Gingrich are immigrants.
STEwarT and Hodgman are using the Straw Man fallacy to make their case even more convincing. Or, for example, they are considered dangerous people who bring immigrant violence, diseases and all kinds of social diseases; Then they change the positons and show how innocent the hosts are and are not entitled to any property brought by the immigrants.

3 0

4 years ago

Why are so many decisions 5 to 4?

algol [13]

The correct answer for this question is this one:

There are so many decisions 5 to 4 because these decisions varies form one judge to the other. The other decision that is common is 9-0. The reason behind this is because many of the court’s cases don’t divide along ideological<span> lines. They might disagree and sometimes don't care.</span>

5 0

3 years ago