1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Damm [24]
2 years ago
9

What is the main way a representative democracy differs from a direct democracy?

Law
1 answer:
Naddika [18.5K]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

the answer is a

Explanation:

the reason is because the citizen picks leaders who vote on the leaders. hope this helps

You might be interested in
Do you agree that some of the most dangerous acts in society or not punished as a girl
drek231 [11]
Yes it is right I do not agree
5 0
3 years ago
Click this link to view O*NET’s Tasks section for Marriage and Family Therapists. Note that common tasks are listed toward the t
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

C, D, F

Explanation:

on edg.

3 0
3 years ago
ARE 80% OF QUESTIONS ANSWERED IN UNDER 10 MINUTES
Serggg [28]

Answer:yes

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Agent Alice has received an offer that she believes is not in the sellers’ best interest. What should Alice do?
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

Make no recommendations and let the sellers decide on their own. Tell the sellers exactly how she feels and why she thinks the offer is not a good one.

7 0
3 years ago
What are the requirements of a criminal conspiracy? Provide an example of a conspiracy and explain how it meets the definition.
damaskus [11]

Answer:

Put simply, a criminal conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. The agreement itself is the crime, but at least one co-conspirator must take an “overt act” in furtherance of the conspiracy. Under the federal conspiracy statute: The agreement by two or more persons is the essence of the crime.

Explanation:

Our question is this: What makes an act one of entrapment? We make a standard distinction between legal entrapment, which is carried out by parties acting in their capacities as (or as deputies of) law-enforcement agents, and civil entrapment, which is not. We aim to provide a definition of entrapment that covers both and which, for reasons we explain, does not settle questions of permissibility and culpability. We explain, compare, and contrast two existing definitions of legal entrapment to commit a crime that possess this neutrality. We point out some problems with the extensional correctness of these definitions and propose a new definition that resolves these problems. We then extend our definition to provide a more general definition of entrapment, encompassing both civil and legal cases. Our definition is, we believe, closer to being extensionally correct and will, we hope, provide a clearer basis for future discussions about the ethics of entrapment than do the definitions upon which it improves.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is Double Jeopardy important to Americans?
    9·1 answer
  • What does recession mean
    7·1 answer
  • Evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights is sometimes
    12·1 answer
  • 2+2 is __ - 1 thats free quick _____<br> if you get it right you get brainlest
    12·2 answers
  • Which kind of question would a civil trial most likely try to answer?
    10·2 answers
  • If Kripto sues Attorney Porquine for breach of the Jones-Porquine contract to recover what he would have received under the will
    11·1 answer
  • A judge cites precedent when delivering a ruling in a case. In doing this, he is harkening back to a practice begun in which set
    15·1 answer
  • Why is the purpose of a Speedy Trial under the Sixth Amendment?
    7·1 answer
  • 1. what is public opinion ?
    14·1 answer
  • Define proto<br>please help​
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!