Adam SchillerMoving from a command economy to a free market
A planned economy or as it more frequently know, a command economy is an
economy run by the state. The government controls, the type of goods/services being
made then allocates them, they have complete control over all resources. Command
economies are not consumer driven, supply and demand don’t factor in, instead the
government is responsible for providing service/goods that increase overall public
wealth. This does mean however that the economy is working on the basis that
everyone will pull their weight, individual gain does not come into a command
economy, it’s all about the good of the nation. Command economies typically have
more control over their people, allocating them jobs not truly based on skill level and
everyone’s pay is relatively the same, this equates to a fierier more equal economy. A
strong sense of Nationalism is what holds a command economy together, everyone
working together to fulfil the common goals of the nation, as all businesses are
nationalised everyone works for the state, which brings them together as a nation.
"<span>a. giving the Indians equal rights and justice as citizens of the United States" was not one of their proposed solutions, since none were willing to cede rights or territory. </span>
Answer: C
Explanation: The Civil War was fought over the moral ( issue of slavery ) . In fact, it was the economics of slavery and political control of that system that was central to the conflict. A key issue was states' rights.
Hello,
I believe the correct answer in which you are looking for is: C. Does Great Britain have the right to exercise control over colonists?
To add some context and supporting factors to my answer, I will explain a bit. The rest of the answers were clear to both sides. The stamp and tea acts was something that stalled a lot of businesses in the colonies. And of course the colonists have historical ties to Britain, that's the whole reason the colonies even existed, because they did not agree to what Britain was doing and they decided to do what was right, and no matter how much they may hate to admit it, they do have ties to Britain. And D just doesn't relate to the subject that much and I would consider it irrelevant. So by process of elimination, the answer is C.
If this helped you at all, please mark brainliest.
-Austin
The difference between an explanation and an
argument essay is best explained by their aims. The aim of an explanation is to make the listener/reader
understand a statement<span>, thus presenting facts in order to give enlightenment on
how or why something occurs. Whereas, the aim of an argument is to make the
listener/reader accept a certain point of view, thus presenting evidence to provide a basis for
believing a certain conclusion to be true.</span>
