Common law evolves in part based on decisions in court cases.
"Common law" in English history was the body of precedents established by courts and procedures from the Middle Ages onward. It wasn't so much that there was a codified system of laws, but there were past practices and procedures that informed legal decisions to be made in the present. The American legal system still takes this sort of approach to law, letting past precedents inform decisions on new situations that arise.
Hitler did not take into consideration the prevailing weather and climatic landscape of soviet Russia.
He attacked on winter and the rest of history. Russians retreated from the cities, often with a scorch Earth policy, and of the German forces that entered Russia: cold and hunger destroyed over 70% of the forces.
Only a handful reached Poland. The soviets red army then striked back.
Answer:
languages, literature, philosophy, history, archaeology, anthropology, human geography, law, politics, religion, and art.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Rwandans take history seriously. Hutu who killed Tutsi did so for many reasons, but beneath the individual motivations lay a common fear rooted in firmly held but mistaken ideas of the Rwandan past. Organizers of the genocide, who had themselves grown up with these distortions of history, skillfully exploited misconceptions about who the Tutsi were, where they had come from, and what they had done in the past. From these elements, they fueled the fear and hatred that made genocide imaginable. Abroad, the policy-makers who decided what to do—or not do—about the genocide and the journalists who reported on it often worked from ideas that were wrong and out-dated. To understand how some Rwandans could carry out a genocide and how the rest of the world could turn away from it, we must begin with history
