Answer:
d. work with technical personnel.
Explanation:
In the given scenario a manufacturer is making a new buy from a seller. This is a risky investment for the buyer because of uncertainty on how the product will perform and lack of technical know-how in operating the product.
The buyer therefore will require the seller to act as a consultant in case of issues arising from the use of the product, buying decision will take a long time because the buyer will want a good fit for their operations, and more work will be done with technical personnel to train them on how to use the product
Answer:
The correct answer is c) reach a settlement that benefits all parties.
Explanation:
Taking into account the nature of the relationship (long-term), an adequate treatment is exclusively required to achieve broad levels of negotiation. When this process is carried out under a harmonious environment, it is more feasible that part and part objectives can be achieved, which allows negotiations to be carried out in the future for the benefit of both people. A negotiation requires time and studies, for which some claims that harm the establishment of a common good must be lowered.
Answer:
The correct answer is option C.
Explanation:
The law of comparative advantage states that a country will produce and export the commodity it has a comparative advantage in producing.
In other words, if the country can produce good cheaply or at a lower opportunity cost.
The good that cannot be produced cheaply or has a higher opportunity cost will be imported from the country that produces it cheaply.
Explanation:
Occupancy rate is the ratio of rented or used space to the total amount of available space.
The potential gross rate is the total rental income a property can produce if all units were fully leased and rented at market rents with a zero vacancy rate.
They relate through that they both allow for renting?
Answer:
A) $56.5
Explanation:
Data:
Project S
Initial cost $10,000
Y1 CF = $6,000
y2 CF = $8,000
Project L
Initial Investment = $10,000
Y1-Y4 CF = $4,373
Solution:
<u>For Project S</u>
We shall prolong the project to four years so it can be easily compared to project L
Following shall be the cashflow stream:
Y0=-$10,000 Y1=$6,000 Y2=-$2,000($8,000 CF - $10,000 outlay for prolonging the project second time) Y3=$6,000 Y4=$8,000
Now to discount the cashflow
<u>For Project L</u>
In order to calculate present value of the annuity, following formula will be used:
<em>NPV = Initial outlay - PV</em>
Now, we can easily calculate how much value will the firm gain or lose if Project L is selected over Project S
<em>*all figures are rounded off to two decimal points*</em>
