Answer:
The correct order of events
a1) Taxes are lowered
a2) Consumers and investors have more money
a3) Businesses prosper
a4) Businesses expand
a5) The economy grows
Explanation:
Supply side economics is an economic theory that suggested that lowering the tax to corporate, government will help in create interest in investing more to industry that will help in enhancing productivity and create jobs and eliminate inflation by slashing down prices.
This idea is an enormous piece of Ronald Reagan's financial arrangements during his administration. This turns into a focal point of "Reaganomics." He utilizes this strategy to drive the American economy during his 8 years of presidency.
The correct order of events
a1) Taxes are lowered
a2) Consumers and investors have more money
a3) Businesses prosper
a4) Businesses expand
a5) The economy grows
Answer:
A: They were independent of one another.
Explanation:
Contrary to popular belief, the Maya were not a single people, but several peoples (ethnicities) who had the same linguistic and cultural origin, and inhabited Mesoamerica.
Factors identified as contributing to the downturn include: returning troops which created a surge in the civilian labor force and problems in absorbing the veterans, a decline in labor union strife, changes in fiscal and monetary policy, and changes in price expectations.
Answer:
coastal erosion, potential impacts of sea level rise, water quality deterioration, and sea water intrusion.
Answer:
Explanation:
Essay Segment or Quote Rubric Rating Comments
Briefly describe ONE major difference between Nash’s and Maier’s historical interpretations of the origins of the American Revolution.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Nash’s argument.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Maier’s argument.
3
2
1
The response to (a) did not earn a point because it is does not adequately describe the arguments of Nash and Maier. It merely lists the idea that Maier believed the Revolution emerged from old ideas, and Nash believed the Revolution was based on new ideas.
The response to (b) earned 1 point by providing evidence that the Boston Tea Party was a specific event that demonstrated the colonists’ rebellion against Great Britain’s taxation, which supports Nash’s argument. The response to
(c) did not earn a point because the Boston Massacre does not support Maier’s argument that the Revolution originated from earlier revolutionary thought.
