Answer:
Could stay in the country for a short time as "guest workers".
Explanation:
Guest workers were allowed to temporarily stay in the country to serve as low-skill workers that did jobs like forestry, tourism, farming, etc. The idea of guest workers aimed to reduce poverty levels and provide a way for illegal immigrants to gain citizenship without having to stay in their original country, which were often places where citizens had no rights and/or lived in extreme poverty. Guest workers often found themselves working for corrupt employers that made these illegal immigrants pay large fees to even get a chance to become a guest worker. So, while the idea was good in theory; corrupt, greedy employers made it practically impossible for illegal immigrants to be able to obtain their goal of citizenship.
Answer: The Central Powers consisted of Austria-Hungary, Germany, Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire. The Allied Powers consist of Great Britain, The United States, China, and the Soviet Union.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
These colonies were also different. There was <u>more religious freedom in the Middle colonies</u> than in the New England colonies. This was especially true in Pennsylvania. The <u>Middle colonies had some slaves while the New England colonies had very few slaves</u>. This is true because there was <u>more large scale farming in the southern part of the Middle colonies where the soil was more fertile and the climate more suited for farming</u>. Thus, another difference is the <u>kind of farming</u> done. In the <u>New England colonies</u>, <u>subsistence farming was practiced</u>. These<u> farmers grew enough for their family, but didn’t have too much left to sell to other people</u>. In the <u>Middle colonies, farmers grew crops for sale</u>. The main cash crop was wheat.
Samuel Gompers began the federation of labor.
Answer:
Social Darwinism describes the various theories that emerged in Western Europe and North America in the 1870s which applied biological concepts of natural selection and survival of the fittest to sociology, economics, and politics. Social Darwinism posits that the strong see their wealth and power increase while the weak see their wealth and power decrease. Different social Darwinist groups have differing views about which groups of people are considered to be the strong and which groups of people are considered to be the weak, and they also hold different opinions about the precise mechanisms that should be used to reward strength and punish weakness. Many such views stress competition between individuals in laissez-faire capitalism, while others were used in support of authoritarianism, eugenics, racism, imperialism, fascism, Nazism, and struggle between national or racial groups.