<h3>the percentage of the rocks on the earths surface that are sedimentary rocks is</h3><h3 /><h2><em><u>75 percent</u></em></h2><h2 />
<em>Sedimentary rocks make up 75 percent of the rocks at the earth's surface but only 5percent of the outer 10 miles of the earth. Sediment, as distinguished fromsedimentary rock, is a collective name for loose, solid particles and is generally derived from weathering and erosion of preexisting rock</em>
hope it helps you ❤
Answer:
Women's liberation is a complicated phrase and it will take a new turn in the political, intellectual and cultural scenario troughout the world.
Explanation:
<em>The movement emerged in the late 60s and continued into the 80s primarily in the industrialized nations of the Western World, which effected great change throughout the World. The Women's Liberation Movement branch of radical feminism, based in contemporary philosophy, comprised women of racially and culturally diverse backgrounds who proposed that economic, psychological and social freedom were necessary for women to progress from being second class citizem in their societies.</em>
<em>They questioned the cultural and legal validity of patriarchy and the pratical validity of social and sexual hierarchies used to control and limit the legal and physical independence of women in society. They proposed that sexism was the principal political problem with the power dynamics of their societies.</em>
<em>In the decades during the movement flourished, liberations successfully changed how women were perceived in their cultures, redefined socio-economic and the political roles of women in society, and transformed mainstream society.</em>
The event that sparked the beginning of the conflict between Hamilton and Jefferson is that Hamilton wanted a strong federal government. He believed in a centralized federal government with strong power.
You'll have to consider for yourself what your own thoughts are, but some of the issues were these:
The United States saw the use of the atomic bombs as a way to bring the war to an end in a way that would cost less American lives. A land invasion of Japan would have meant many American soldiers being killed in battle. However, the cost in Japanese lives was enormous by the use of the bombs, and that was not given equal consideration.
Another consideration was that the United States had been engaging in a fire-bombing campaign of Japanese cities prior to the use of atomic bombs. The fire-bombing campaigns were horrifically destructive also, but did not have the radiation after-effects of atomic bombings.
An option that could have been used rather than dropping atomic bombs was to enlist Soviet troops in a joint invasion of Japan. But the USA wanted to avoid postwar Soviet presence in Japan, and the atomic bombs were seen as a way of ending the war quickly. You can consider whether it would have been a more "moral" way of pursuing war to conduct a land invasion with Soviet assistance.
Finally, the escalation to the point of using atomic bombs was, in part, due to the Allies' insistence on an "unconditional surrender" by Japan. A second bomb was dropped at Nagasaki after the first was dropped on Hiroshima, because Japan did not submit to unconditional surrender in the immediate aftermath of the Hiroshima bombing. You can consider for yourself whether some other resolution besides "unconditional surrender" was a viable option for ending the war with Japan.
