1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lapo4ka [179]
2 years ago
9

Francisco Pizarro conquered Perú in?

History
1 answer:
Natali5045456 [20]2 years ago
5 0

In 1532, accompanied by his brothers, Pizarro overthrew the Inca leader Atahualpa and conquered Peru

You might be interested in
explain how the Wilmot Proviso was so controversial in raising the debate over the slave issue again to such intense levels.
Pachacha [2.7K]

The Whigs faced a different scenario. The victory of James K. Polk (Democrat) over Henry Clay (Whig) in the 1844 presidential election had caught the southern Whigs by surprise. The key element of this defeat, which carried over into the congressional and local races in 1845 and 1846 throughout the South, was the party's failure to take a strong stand favoring Texas annexation. Southern Whigs were reluctant to repeat their mistakes on Texas, but, at the same time, Whigs from both sections realized that victory and territorial acquisition would again bring out the issue of slavery and the territories. In the South in particular, there was already the realization, or perhaps fear, that the old economic issues that had defined the Second Party System<span> were already dead. Their political goal was to avoid any sectional debate over slavery which would expose the sectional divisions within the party.</span>After an earlier attempt to acquire Texas by treaty had failed to receive the necessary two-thirds approval of the Senate, the United States annexed the Republic of Texas by a joint resolution of Congress that required simply a majority vote in each house of Congress. President John Tyler signed the bill on March 1, 1845, a few days before his term ended. As many expected, the annexation led to war with Mexico. After the capture of New Mexico and California in the first phases of the war, the political focus shifted to how much territory would be acquired from Mexico. The key to this was the determination of the future status of slavery in any new territory.

Both major political parties had labored long to keep divisive slavery issues out of national politics. The Democrats had generally been successful in portraying those within their party attempting to push a purely sectional issue as extremists that were well outside the normal scope of traditional politics.[2] However, midway through Polk's term, Democratic dissatisfaction with the administration was growing within the Martin Van Buren, or Barnburner, wing of the Democratic Party over other issues. Many felt that Van Buren had been unfairly denied the party's nomination in 1844 when southern delegates resurrected a convention rule, last used in 1832, requiring that the nominee had to receive two-thirds of the delegate votes. Many in the North were also upset with the Walker tariff which reduced the tariff rates; others were opposed to Polk's veto of a popular river and harbor improvements bill, and still others were upset over the Oregon settlement with Great Britain where it appeared that Polk did not pursue the northern territory with the same vigor he used to acquire Texas. Polk was seen more and more as enforcing strict party loyalty primarily to serve southern interests. Hope This Helps! Can I have Brainliest? Please:)

7 0
3 years ago
How did john locke feel about educating children
ch4aika [34]
He loved it he loved helping out parents
4 0
3 years ago
How was Edward Braddock killed
taurus [48]

Answer:

The British attempted retreat, but ran into the rest of the British soldiers earlier left behind. Braddock rallied his men repeatedly, but fell at last, mortally wounded by a shot through the chest. ... Before he died, Braddock left Washington his ceremonial sash that he wore with his battle uniform.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do McCarthy’s references to Abraham Lincoln at the beginning and end of his speech support his argument?
Helga [31]

McCarthy is trying to win the audience to his viewpoint straightaway by inducing  one of America's most loved presidents of all times.Once you have drawn the attention of your audience,they are going to listen to you to the end of your speech hopefully.

As we celebrate the birth of this man who with his whole heart and soul hated war, I would like to be able to speak of peace in our time, of war being outlawed, and of world-wide disarmament.

And because that day was the birthday of Abraham Lincoln,it was very apt to mention Abraham's name as he always championed for disarmament and no war policies and wanted peace and prosperity for all.

6 0
3 years ago
The first cars that were invented did not run on gasoline. What powered the first cars?
vodomira [7]

Heated water in a boiler.


7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • During the Nullification Crisis of 1832, South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union because it disagreed with a federal
    14·1 answer
  • Which best describes how the media influence the development of policy
    13·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. George works in a factory and is a member of the labor union. He thinks his wages are low for the wor
    13·1 answer
  • How did Shays's Rebellion highlight major problems with the Articles of Confederation?
    5·1 answer
  • Factories in ______ manufacture airplanes
    11·2 answers
  • Which right did The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen not grant?
    13·2 answers
  • I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST
    5·1 answer
  • Was the monroe doctrine an appropriate foreign policy statement for the United states in 1823
    14·1 answer
  • What is an ayatollah?
    13·2 answers
  • How does All men have some rights given to them by God have an impact on society?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!