What did the supreme court say in its ruling in regents of the university of california v. bakke (1978)? affirmative action prog
rams do not violate the constitution. racial quotas are necessary to correct for past discrimination. the constitution forbids any government policy that uses a racial classification. even states without official segregation policies must take steps to integrate their schools.
In the ruling by the supreme court in regents of the university of california v bakke ( 1978 ) : ( A ) affirmative action programs do not violate the constitution
<h3>Regents of the university of california v. bakke (1978)</h3>
In the ruling the supreme court ruled that the use of affirmative action programmes which allows the admission of minority applicants in the universities is a constitutional process in certain circumstances, while the use of racial quotas for the admission into universities was ruled as unconstitutional.
Hence we can conclude In the ruling by the supreme court in regents of the university of california v bakke ( 1978 ) : ( A ) affirmative action programs do not violate the constitution
