1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dangina [55]
2 years ago
7

Why is forensic science only as good as the person conducting the science ?

Law
2 answers:
Burka [1]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Because they have to be good at their job. You can’t somehow have your work be better than you or the person conducting the science because then that would mean that there might have been someone else helping them when they weren’t supposed to.

Explanation:

NeX [460]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Forensic science is a fascinating and highly developed field where scientific methods are used to help in matters of law. The field of forensic science is very broad, and draws upon a number of scientific branches, with a special focus on the recognition, identification, and evaluation of physical evidence.

You might be interested in
Would you be willing to be a whistle blower? On what type of issue would you blow the whistle? Inflated overtime submitted on a
garik1379 [7]
Whistleblowing occurs when an employee reports illegal conduct at work that is not related to workplace rights. For example, you are a whistleblower if you report that your company is cooking the books; engaging in shareholder fraud; producing faulty, dangerous, or mislabeled products; or lying on its tax returns.
5 0
3 years ago
Ya diggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
arlik [135]

Answer:

yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bruh

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which task would most likely be completed by a fraud examiner ? ^
ehidna [41]

Answer:

D......................

7 0
4 years ago
Single-member districts and changes in election laws have
BaLLatris [955]
Is true I answered and got it good
8 0
3 years ago
Can someone give ma an argument from the Tinker v. Des moines court case.
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

In a 7-2 choice, the Supreme Court's larger part ruled that not one or the other understudies nor instructors “shed their sacred rights to opportunity of discourse or expression at the school building gate.” The Court took the position that school authorities seem not deny as it were on the doubt that the discourse might disturb the learning

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The legislative system is given powers granted to it by the Constitution in_________.
    10·2 answers
  • What are the two key properties of eye<br> witness testimony
    5·2 answers
  • What characteristics has to be present for government to be an oligarchy
    9·2 answers
  • 2. What are the three parts of the executive branch?
    9·2 answers
  • Increased visibility can be achieved by allowing cyclists to merge with regular traffic...
    10·1 answer
  • Discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of the reparations Germany paid at the end of World War I. Why do you think the
    7·1 answer
  • What is classical criminology
    15·2 answers
  • If you live on the border of Trenton and Pennsylvania does common in law apply?
    8·1 answer
  • Citizenship as a right that is materialised through active participation
    14·1 answer
  • Is it legal to go to someone’s house to peaceful confront them about a scam?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!