In the situation described and following the definition and common use cases of precedent, I would confirm that it is my opinion that the judge in question did in fact fail to follow precedent.
Precedent is described as a<em><u> </u></em><em><u>past event </u></em><em><u>and/or </u></em><em><u>action </u></em><em><u>which is used as a </u></em><em><u>guide </u></em><em><u>when </u></em><em><u>considering </u></em><em><u>the course of </u></em><em><u>action </u></em><em><u>for a </u></em><em><u>similar</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>situation</u></em>. Given the keyword "similar" in this definition, it can be argued that in order for precedent to apply to a situation, it is <em><u>not necessary </u></em>for the details of each situation to be <u>identical</u>.
Therefore, the defense attorney can argue the failure to follow precedent <u>based solely on the similarly obscure nature of each law</u>. Furthermore, if the defense attorney is able to procure evidence of <u>past infractions of this law for which no charges were upheld</u>, it would almost certainly result in the appeal being granted and the subsequent review of the law in question.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/885855?referrer=searchResults
Explanation:
All staff members of the court should be impartial to all people at any cost. This is court staff members' duty that they should protect all people from all impartiality or other bad consequences that affect people very badly. They can protect from impartiality, unfairness, and injustice. There are rules that no one can connect with someone before the court. The court can provide the information to both sides of the party but could not advise legal information to anyone.
- It can provide the number of local lawyer services.
- It can explain how the court work.
The answer is B
The judicial branch is the supreme court
The foreign policy would have a strong nationalistic component, and alliances and treaties would only be formed when they were advantageous to American Indian policy.
<h3>What did alliances in World War 1 mean?</h3>
A WW1 alliance system. As previously established, the definition of alliances WW1 is a pact between a group of nations to aid one another in times of conflict. Before the conflict started, the alliance structure for WW1 was established. Some alliance systems go all the way back to the nineteenth century.
<h3>What kind of alliances are examples of?</h3>
One of the best examples of a strategic partnership is the agreement between Starbucks with Barnes & Noble. Coffee is brewed by Starbucks. Books can be found at Barnes & Noble. To a benefit of the both businesses, each one does what it does best while splitting the costs of the facility.
To know more about alliances visit:
brainly.com/question/28195787
#SPJ4