Answer:
The juvenile justice system
Explanation:
delinquent behavior through police, court, and correctional involvement, with the goal of rehabilitation. Youth and their guardians can face a variety of consequences including probation, community service, youth court, youth incarceration, and alternative schooling.
Answer:
Because intellectual property theft is a non-violent crime, usually corporate and for financial reasons.
Explanation:
Law enforcement is aimed at solving violent crimes, of large proportions that promote physical damage and well expressed. Theft of intellectual property does not fit this type of crime, since it is a non-violent crime, of a corporate nature and that causes financial damage, but does not promote physical and widespread harm. In this case, this type of crime is best addressed by the private security and technology mission.
Answer:
Explanation:
A lower court judge in a bankruptcy proceeding], having found Cannon's briefs to be ofunusually high quality, issued an order directing Cannon to certify that he was the author of the two briefs in question. Cannon filed a response indicating that both briefs were his soleresponsibility and that they "relied heavily" upon an article entitled Why Professionals Must beInterested in "Disinterestedness" Under the Bankruptcy Codeby William H. Schrag and MarkC. Haut. Cannon further admitted that his initial brief "exceeded permissible fair use withoutattestation" of the source. He reported he had informed his client about his mistake as well asthe bar association.The bankruptcy court initiated sanction proceedings against Cannon. The bankruptcy courtconcluded that seventeen of the nineteen pages of legal analysis in the initial brief wereverbatim excerpts from the article, with only variations for format and deletion of mattersdetrimental to Cannon's position . . .In light of its conclusion that Cannon committed plagiarism and charged an unreasonable fee,the bankruptcy court ordered Cannon to (1) complete a law-school-equivalent course inprofessional responsibility, (2) disgorge the fee charged to his client for the briefs' preparation,(3) formally notify the authors of the plagiarized article and provide the court with a copy of thecorrespondence, and (4) provide copies of the sanction order to Chief Judge Pratt and the[disciplinary] board.WHAT ADDITIONAL PENALTY WAS PROPOSED?Attorney Cannon and the [attorney] disciplinary board settled on a "Public Reprimand" [a public recordthat can severely impact a career] . . .WHY DID THE IOWA SUPREME COURT APPROVE THE “PUBLIC REPRIMAND” PENALTY?The Iowa Supreme Court decided to approve the public reprimand:
