Answer:
John Robert Lewis was born outside of Troy, Alabama, on February 21, 1940. Lewis had a happy childhood — though he needed to work hard to assist his sharecropper parents — but he chafed against the unfairness of segregation. He was particularly disappointed when the Supreme Court ruling in 1954's Brown v. The Board of Education didn't affect his school life. However, hearing King's sermons and news of the 1955-56 Montgomery bus boycott inspired Lewis to act for the changes he wanted to see.
Explanation:
After the independence of the United States, there was a great demand for muskets in the nation, and independence made it possible to produce manufactured goods. Eli Whitney found sponsors to support the concept of interchangeable production parts in the manufacture of muskets. However, their sponsors became very impatient when, after a considerable time had passed and they had spent a lot of money, they learned that they were still making tools to make parts. In the long run, however, their efforts managed to produce interchangeable and economic parts in large quantities. The concept of producing a set of dies to make a million parts, which is already accepted today, was not well understood at that time.
Whitney's invention of the cotton gin typifies many extremely important mechanical advances of the time, but there is little doubt that his concept of creating tools to produce interchangeable parts was the greatest innovation of that period.
Whitney's concepts were later exploited by Henry Ford and others in the industry.
The North Vietnamese military (also known as the Vietcong) tactics made it difficult for the United States to defeat them because:
A) They did not wear uniforms- This made it challenging for the United States military to differentiate between who was a citizen and who was a member of the Vietcong.
B) Ambush/Hit and run style of fighting- This military style of fighting can be seen as unpredictable and random. This makes it so that the US military has to be on high alert at all times.
Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
