In the 3rd century, a serious crisis that had a huge influence on the disintegration of the Roman Empire. Taken by a territory of great proportions, the State was unable to maintain its political-administrative hegemony among the various peoples that were under its control. At the same time that the wealth obtained was immense, the problems and expenses were also manifested in a similar proportion.
The scenario worsened with the crisis of the slave system, triggered by the absence of new territories to be conquered and which, in turn, would guarantee the supply of the huge workforce that supported the Empire. As time went by, the lack of slaves determined a natural process of economic retraction, since landowners could not afford to explore all the land available for agricultural activity.
The rich and dynamic economy sustained by slave labor began to crumble progressively. Without strength, the Roman government would allow barbarians to enter its dominions, a large number of slaves would be freed by the retraction of the economy and the large plebeian mass, supported by the government, would lose its privileges. In the economic sphere, activities would abandon an articulated market and then turn to local subsistence.
Observing the triggering of these events, we see that the Roman Empire lost the fundamental characteristics that organized its own existence. In general, we see that over the decades, a large portion of those domains would be marked by other characteristics and practices in the cultural, economic and political spheres. The crisis was taking place, so that we could develop experiences that would mark the beginning of the Middle Ages.
Answer Below as A Picture
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "b. people relied more on religion, magic, and superstition than on science to deal with the disease." From information we know about seventeenth-century reactions to the plague, we can infer that people relied more on religion, magic, and superstition than on science to deal with the disease.
Answer:
on Agree on contingencies, monitoring, and evaluation.
Explanation:
<h3><em>
Conditions may change. Make contingency agreements about foreseeable future circumstances (If-then!).
</em></h3><h3><em>
How will you monitor compliance and follow-through?
</em></h3><h3><em>
Create opportunities to evaluate the agreements and their implementation. ("Let's try it this way for three months and then look at it.")
</em></h3><h3><em>
Effective problem solving does take some time and attention more of the latter than the former. But less time and attention than is required by a problem not well solved. What it really takes is a willingness to slow down. A problem is like a curve in the road. Take it right and you'll find yourself in good shape for the straightaway that follows. Take it too fast and you may not be in as good shape.</em></h3>
To be 18 and not a criminal
