Didududjjdduf ieiejdjdjrrjjd jrjrjrjrj
Answer:
b. Restrict first amendment rights.
Explanation:
The Schenck v. United States (1919) Supreme Court case ruled by putting limitations on the rights of individuals if it concerns the interest of the nation. This ruling states that constitutional rights are not absolute and can be changed anytime the government sees fit.
The Supreme Court decided to issue the limits on the freedoms of individuals, especially during wartime. This ruling established the ability of the government in suppressing any speech or news that it thinks is harmful to the welfare of the nation. It stated that with concerns regarding the <em>"clear and present danger" </em>that can put the nation in jeopardy, the government is free to restrict the first amendment rights as and when it feels necessary.
Thus, the correct answer is option b.
It’s very very quick and strong
Explanation
He felt that the Court’s decision touaght the students wrong lesson because its leading them into a mere society where they would be less educated on their rights as a citizen
Answer:
Exception
Explanation:
An exception is something that is left out
