The constitution has been mentioned by many people so far. Sure. That does answer your question in a literal sense. However, which dictators throughout history have ever cared about the laws in their country?
Besides laws and the constitution, what many Canadians would be reluctant to mention is the fact that there are 38+ million people in Canada, many of whom are armed. The prime minister is just one person. Sure, they control the military, but Canada is huge! Armed civilians using guerilla tactics would be a serious challenge for Canada's military, even if they backed the would be dictator, which I think would be unlikely, especially by a majority.
Just to be clear to our southern neighbours, we don't need “the 2nd” to defend ourselves from a would be dictator. We are just fine. And we have lots of guns.
In the last decade of the 18th century, both France and England experienced revolutions. In France it was a political revolution against the Old Order, and in England it was an economic revolution that changed the way wealth was produced and shared.
Answer: B.) intentional infliction of emotional distress
Explanation: Emotional damage or distress often result from actions aimed at an individual's psychological system. Negative words, comments or analysis of an individual usually contribute a lot to the emotional trauma people usually witness which could result in loss of confidence or despondency. The professor's comment seems damaging and it is capable of inflicting emotional distresses on the target. Therefore, the professor could be held liable of intentional infliction of emotional distress on the student if sued.
Frederick Douglass<span> was born in February 1817 on the eastern shore of Maryland. ... slaves out to </span>others<span>, decided to send Douglass to Baltimore, Maryland, to live with ... beat and mistreat slaves until they </span>gave<span>up and did whatever they were told. ... his </span>speeches<span> were well thought out and forceful, and he was able to </span>inspire<span> </span>
