The sentence in which the pronoun and the antecedent are not in agreement is option C. If the bus is late, he will be late to class. In the first clause, the subject of the sentence is the word "bus", and in the next clause, the subject changed to "he" and the pronoun he does not clearly state its antecedent.
Answer:
1,2,5,6
Explanation:
Those sentences that I listed above have both a noun and verb in it. Sentences 3 and 4 do not have a verb therefore they are not complete sentences.
Answer:
The answer to Part A would be Ignorant, as the author goes on to state that his youthful understanding had struggled in vain. If someone is ignorant of something, yet they do not take the time to actually go research or learn about that thing, then they would be struggling in vain because they are selfish and not taking time to research what it is that the other person is saying that they do not understand.
For the answer to Part B, I would say that (Frederick) Douglass' new awareness of how owners maintain control over slaves allows him to better understand how to improve his situation. I say this because he seems to have an awakening/epiphany in the very last line: "I now understood what had been to me a most perplexing difficulty".
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
I think the answer is A)He combines details and indisputable facts with hyperbole and understatement to demonstrate the complexities of attempting to unify forces in order to promote change among opposing groups of citizens.
but I am not 100% sure since I have not read "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" in a couple of years.
None of these are correct, phyll, is most cases, means leaf. However, it is the suffix of chlorophyll, which is a green pigment in most plants. With this being said, I would go with green.
Hope this helps!
