All categories

2 years ago

On a number line 1.77 would be located where?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Bezzdna [24]2 years ago

3 0

Step-by-step explanation:

1.77 would be closer to 2

You might be interested in

The answer is not A can someone plz help me I’m not understanding it thank you it would be appreciated

jeka94

nswer:

209.8

Step-by-step explanation:

the bottom is = 11 * 5

two of the sides are 11 * 9.3 / 2 because they are triangles, and then times 2 because there are two of them

the other two sides are 10.5 * 5 / 2 , and the * 2 because there are two of them again.

(11 * 5) + (11 * 9.3 * 2 / 2) + (10.5 * 5 * 2 / 2) =209.8

6 0

3 years ago

If Vector u=(5,-7) and v=(-11,3), 2v-6u=_____ and ||2v-6u||≈_____

Sauron [17]

<h2>Answer:</h2>

$2\vec{v}-6\vec{u}=(-52,48) \\ \\ ||2\vec{v}-6\vec{u}||=75.28}$

<h2>Step-by-step explanation:</h2>

In this problem we have two vectors:

$\vec{u}=(5,-7) \ and \ \vec{v}=(-11,3)$

So we need to find two things:

$2\vec{v}-6\vec{u}$

and:

$||2\vec{v}-6\vec{u}||$

FIRST:

In this case we have the multiplication of vectors by scalars. A scalar is a simple number, so:

$2\vec{v}-6\vec{u} \\ \\ Replace \ \vec{v} \ and \ \vec{u} \ by \ the \ given \ vectors: \\ \\ 2(-11,3)-6(5,-7) \\ \\ Multiply \ each \ component \ by \ the \ corresponding \ scalar:\\ \\ (2\times (-11),2\times 3)+(-6\times 5,-6\times (-7)) \\ \\ (-22,6)+(-30,42) \\ \\ Sum \ of \ vectors: \\ \\ (-22-30,6+42) \\ \\ \therefore \boxed{(-52,48)}$

SECOND:

If we name:

$\vec{w}=2\vec{v}-6\vec{u}$

Then, $||2\vec{v}-6\vec{u}||$ is the magnitude of the vector $\vec{w}$ . Therefore:

$||\vec{w}||=||2\vec{v}-6\vec{u}|| \\ \\ ||\vec{w}||=||(-52,48)|| \\ \\ ||\vec{w}||=\sqrt{(-58)^2+48^2} \\ \\ ||\vec{w}||=\sqrt{3364+2304} \\ \\ ||\vec{w}||=\sqrt{5668} \\ \\ \boxed{||\vec{w}||=75.28}$

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Let f(x,y,z) = ztan-1(y2) i + z3ln(x2 + 1) j + z k. find the flux of f across the part of the paraboloid x2 + y2 + z = 3 that li

Sophie [7]

Consider the closed region $V$ bounded simultaneously by the paraboloid and plane, jointly denoted $S$ . By the divergence theorem,

$\displaystyle\iint_S\mathbf f(x,y,z)\cdot\mathrm dS=\iiint_V\nabla\cdot\mathbf f(x,y,z)\,\mathrm dV$

And since we have

$\nabla\cdot\mathbf f(x,y,z)=1$

the volume integral will be much easier to compute. Converting to cylindrical coordinates, we have

$\displaystyle\iiint_V\nabla\cdot\mathbf f(x,y,z)\,\mathrm dV=\iiint_V\mathrm dV$
$=\displaystyle\int_{\theta=0}^{\theta=2\pi}\int_{r=0}^{r=1}\int_{z=2}^{z=3-r^2}r\,\mathrm dz\,\mathrm dr\,\mathrm d\theta$
$=\displaystyle2\pi\int_{r=0}^{r=1}r(3-r^2-2)\,\mathrm dr$
$=\dfrac\pi2$

Then the integral over the paraboloid would be the difference of the integral over the total surface and the integral over the disk. Denoting the disk by $D$ , we have

$\displaystyle\iint_{S-D}\mathbf f\cdot\mathrm dS=\frac\pi2-\iint_D\mathbf f\cdot\mathrm dS$

Parameterize $D$ by

$\mathbf s(u,v)=u\cos v\,\mathbf i+u\sin v\,\mathbf j+2\,\mathbf k$
$\implies\mathbf s_u\times\mathbf s_v=u\,\mathbf k$

which would give a unit normal vector of $\mathbf k$ . However, the divergence theorem requires that the closed surface $S$ be oriented with outward-pointing normal vectors, which means we should instead use $\mathbf s_v\times\mathbf s_u=-u\,\mathbf k$ .

Now,

$\displaystyle\iint_D\mathbf f\cdot\mathrm dS=\int_{u=0}^{u=1}\int_{v=0}^{v=2\pi}\mathbf f(x(u,v),y(u,v),z(u,v))\cdot(-u\,\mathbf k)\,\mathrm dv\,\mathrm du$
$=\displaystyle-4\pi\int_{u=0}^{u=1}u\,\mathrm du$
$=-2\pi$

So, the flux over the paraboloid alone is

$\displaystyle\iint_{S-D}\mathbf f\cdot\mathrm dS=\frac\pi2-(-2\pi)=\dfrac{5\pi}2$

6 0

3 years ago

Use the distributive property to expand the following expression:

KIM [24]

Answer:

This is guess of what the question is asking:

I had got 49x - 21y - 6.

Step-by-step explanation:

7 x 7 is 49 and 7 x 3 is 21.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Solve -3(-2x+20)=-8(x+12)+92 please?

sveta [45]

The answer is x=4 hope it helps

8 0

3 years ago