The correct answer is D. 7 - 4 - 6 - 4 - 6 - 6 - 5.
Just count the number of syllables: there are 7 in the first line, 4 in the second, 6 in the third, 4 in the fourth, 6 in the fifth, 6 in the sixth, and 5 in the seventh line. A syllable usually has only one vowel - if there are more than one vowel next to each other, that's called a diphth.ong and is counted as one syllable.
In a simple sentence, it only consist of a single or compound subject and a single or compound predicate and conveys a complete thought. Therefore, in a simple sentence, there is only ONE independent clause. The answer for this, therefore, would be option D. Hope this answers your question.
<span>Words of the same root with different affixes are well
thought-out different words, so in that regard it would follow that there would
be more words. But if you mean there might be a capability to change an
existing word simply and clearly put off or negate people inventing entirely
new words, root and all? In that circumstance, especially considering each
modification of a root is in theory a separate word, there would be no much
impact; all words have to start from somewhere.</span>
D probably because he loved to express himself through words