During the Civil War, the Union raised blockades along the coastline of southern territory in order to prevent the enemy to receive supplies from allied encampments. This occurrance gave birth to <em>blockade runners, </em>which were steamboats meant to bypass blockades and reach allied territory with supplies at hand. To Georgia, the receipt of supplies would have been a major boost to the Confederation's position in war, since it would have allowed them to trade their resources with foreign nations for military equipment comparable to that of the Union's gauge.
Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
This scenario is related to this following source and type <u>Source - Statutory, Type – Civil</u>.
Option: B
<u>Explanation</u>:
Statutory Law is a source law which is a written law that is passed by a legislature’s body as an opposition to the oral or customary law or a regulatory law pronounced by the common law of the judiciary or the executives. It can be originated either with local municipalities or state legislatures or national legislatures.
Civil is the type of law which deals with rules body which defines and protects the private rights of the citizens of the nation. It provides legal reforms to resolve or solve any dispute. Contracts, torts, properties and family laws come under this type of law. In the above scenario there is a dispute between Alex and Reese. The property of the Alex is damaged so, Alex wanted to take Reese to court and solve this problem. If there are any disputes then civil type of law deals with it.
"Verbalizes that a substance abuse problem exists
" is an appropriate initial outcome criterion for this client
<u>Answer:</u> Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
The client must recognize that there is an issue of substance abuse that creates disorder; verbalizing that a substance abuse problem exists depicts that the client is not ignoring and takes the very first step towards development.
Once a problem is established, it is possible to discuss or find out the number of ways in which drug use has motivated the life of the client and the relatable behavioral issues, and the nurse may help the client by communicating and managing unpleasant feelings.
