The main purpose as well as the cause of the failure of performance appraisal process is as described below-
Explanation:
Appraisal refers to the process (mostly formal) to evaluate the productivity of the manpower of an organisation. It serves for administrative as well as developmental purpose.
Performance appraisal serves three important purpose-
- Providing adequate feedback to employees based on his/her performance.
- It can help in modifying employee behaviour and thus contributing to an effective workspace environment.
- Providing qualitative parameters to higher-order authority through which they can adjudge their subordinates.
However, appraisals occasionally fail in their motive due to following reasons-
- Appraisals are prone to biases prevailing in the work environment. Moreover, the neutrality of the rating authority is also often under the scanner.
- The appraisals are often inflicted by sampling error. The conclusion of few cannot be generalised on all.
- Appraisals don’t take into account the variability of the employee's performance, Rather it relies on the end performance and the start.
Answer:
resource acquisition
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the argument for diversity best demonstrated by intel's actions would be resource acquisition. This is when a company focuses on obtaining the right resources needed to accomplish the goals and needs of a project. Which in this case are talented individuals who happen to be minority workers.
Answer:
2. False
Explanation:
Capacity to a contract refers to whether the person to a contract is legally competent to enter into such a contract.
For instance, lunatics, drunkards, minors, criminals and person of unsound mind are deemed incapable of entering into a contract.
A person diagnosed with dementia, which impairs his decision making would normally be regarded as incapable to signing a contract.
But, capacity is ascertained as per the situation i.e at the time the contract is signed or entered into.
In the given case, Ronald entered a contract while he was sane and in healthy state of mind. His judgement at the time of entering such a contract wasn't impaired by dementia.
Thus, the contract will be legally enforceable as per the law.
Answer:
A) Communicate regularly about the firm’s progress toward meeting its strategic objectives as well as the threats and weaknesses that pose challenges.
D) Adopt a compensation plan that pays employees more when the company meets its goals.
Explanation:
If Cumberland Farms wanted to take other actions to empower its workforce, they should consider communicate regularly about the firm’s progress toward meeting its strategic objectives as well as the threats and weaknesses that pose challenges. this will allow employees to have a better idea of the company and can make better decisions.
They must also adopt a compensation plan that pays employees more when the company meets its goals which would motivate employees to make decisions that would benefit the company and work harder.
Answer:
Yes $30 agsinst $19.50
The variable cost for the first 50 untis is $17.50
Yes $30 against $27.25
average variable cost for the first 100 units $26.25
Marginal cost for the first 50 units: 17.50 which is lower than marginal revenue
from 51 units and subsequent untis: 35 which is higher than marginal revenue
It will produce 50 units achieving $525 of profit
Explanation:
$100 fixed cost /50 units + 17.50 = 19.50 average cost
selling price: $30
100 fixed cost + 17.50 x 50 + 35 x 50 = 2725
total cost 2,725 / 100 units = 27.25 unit average cost
selling price $30
($17.50 x 50 + $35 x 50)/100 = 26.25
After the 50untis our profit will decrease as the marginal revenue is lower than marginal cost thus, we stuop production at the 50 units:
50 x 30 - 100 fixed cost - 17.50 x 50 variable cost = 525 profit
