The rosenberg case was appealed to the supreme court in 1951.
<u>Fourth Amendment Law Enforcement explained below: </u>
- The Fourth Amendment permits the right to be free from non-reasonable searches by the government.
- The government should complete an analysis of the commitment of crime that had taken place before the search warrant to be given.
- They also have permission to search the area whether the area has done any illegal things.
- The government is much more careful in protecting the law right to liberty and they are so consciousness in not disturbing the normal people.
Ethics 2, he attempt to develop a means for determining the values of society is known as ethics. 2. An action or law that conflicts with the most fundamental law of the nation and is, therefore, no longer valid, is said to be unconstitutional
The response of the criminal justice system due to the pandemic somehow affects the provision of public safety but stopping the virus from spreading was also important.
<h3>What is the criminal justice system?</h3>
A network of government and commercial institutions tied together to manage crime and control with the help of Academics, law enforcement, and the judiciary is referred to as a criminal justice system.
The criminal justice system has taken risks with public safety but protecting the health of citizens by stopping the spread of the virus was also important.
If the justice system becomes strict during a pandemic then they will face major protests as people were suffering from a lack of necessities and the action of the police will worsen the situation.
Therefore, it affected the pending case of crimes as courts are closed which postponed the decision making.
Learn more about the Criminal Justice system, here:
brainly.com/question/15715106
#SPJ1
Answer:
1. "Loose lips sink ships." Share certain information can jeopardize OpSec, and result in advantages for enemy troops.
2. 1A should protect ALL speech. censoring specific words is a form of bias. People should instead be taught coping skills when presented with ideas they find objectionable. "Hate speech" presumes there is a speaker and a listener. The speaker can share anything he likes. The listener is the regulated party. When presented with objectionable ideas, he has choices: he can choose the respond calmly and reasonably; he can respond with aggression; or, he can ignore it and walk away.
