The Supreme Court has not become more restrictive in protecting the right to privacy, so this claim is false.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The Supreme Court understood that the right to privacy is essential to protect citizens, especially those involved in marginalized situations.
- For this reason, the Supreme Court decided to expand the privacy rights and not restrict them as shown in the question above.
This supreme court attitude is intended to promote greater protection for individuals who are marginalized and who may suffer intolerant and life-threatening attacks.
More information:
brainly.com/question/1145825?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
consideration. capacity.
Explanation:
the legal ability to enter into a binding agreement. people suffering from mental illness, intoxicated persons, those under the age of majority do not have. capacity.
In the Miranda decision, the officers are required to give to you before questioning you You have the right to remain silent Anything you say can and will be used against you in court. Etc
A c e a the rest tho not sure
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
To be exact, a documented confession is an admission of guilt. If there is no documentation of the confession, the confession can be pulled at any time. The confession must also not be negated by the one who confessed at any time, or challenged by any party.
~
