"A person supported is arrested for slapping and kicking a store clerk during a community activity."
This is assault, one party physically attacked the other.
Lets take a look at the options:
1. Allegation of abuse, neglect, or exploitation
. This could be a possible answer, but read it carefully, "ALLEGATION." This means they where accused of abuse, in this case this is not a viable option because we know the attack happened.
2. Reportable Staff Misconduct. Nope, the staff was attacked.
3. Reportable Medical Incident. This is a medical incident because the clerk was attacked, but lets look at the other options.
4. Non-reportable Incident
. No, this incident was reported to police and the suspect was arrested.
5. Criminal Conduct or Probable Criminal Conduct. Yes, this is criminal conduct. The suspect was most likely arrested for felony assault, the victim experienced significant violence amounting to substantially more than a minor slap across the face or a punch in the jaw.
In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed in response to the Enron and WorldCom scandals, offering broad protections for whistleblowers at public companies in order to encourage fraud reporting. Private companies were considered immune to the law.
But in 2014 the Supreme Court heard a challenge to SOX, and ruled that even though the plaintiffs were not employees of the publicly traded company, the SOX whistleblower statute applied to them. The reason? They suffered retaliation for reporting alleged fraud involving financial reporting of a publicly-traded company.
Here’s what the law now says:
SOX covers employees of a public company’s private contractors and subcontractors.
SOX covers privately-owned companies if they provide services for publicly-traded ones. Answer:
Explanation:
C-It acts as the final authority on the constitutionality of state and federal laws
The two other answers to this question are spot on, but I'm going to interpret this question in a different way. I'm going to answer it as if the question said "Who was the first presidential style Prime Minister of UK?"
I would argue that there have been two 'Presidents of the United Kingdom': Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.
For the first eight years of her administration, Margaret Thatcher was effectively 'the President of the United Kingdom'. Her administration was able to do things most post war PMs were not able to do, possibly buoyed by the large mandates she was given by the British public in 1979 and 1983.
Given the landslide election of 1997, it became almost impossible for the Conservative party to win the 2001 election, and very unlikely that would would have much of a chance in 2005 (Michael Portillo's words, not just mine). With this sort of a political landscape and public mandate, Blair was able to govern as a de-facto president, allowing him to push through parliament decisions that didn't have, not only, the public's backing but even the backing of much of the Labour party. This can be seen in Blair's decisions regarding Iraq and Afghanistan post 9/11.
