Answer:
Width = 12 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that,
Area of a rectangle is 168 square feet.
The ratio of the width to the length is 6:7.
Let the length is 7x and width is 6x.
According to question,
Area = 168 sq feet
l×b=168 sq feet
7x × 6x = 168
42x² = 168
x² = 4
x = 2
Length = 7x = 7(2) = 14 feet
Breadth = 6x = 6(2) = 12 feet
So, the width of the rectangle us 12 feet.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the rise over run formula
y2-y1/x2-x1
1992-1990/3317-3038
2/-279
-139.5
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
Use a rigid transformation to prove that angle NPO is congruent to angle NLM
=====================================================
Explanation:
The AA stands for "angle angle". So we need two pairs of angles to prove the triangles to be similar. The first pair of angles is the vertical angles ONP and MNL, which are congruent. Any pair of vertical angles are always congruent.
The second pair of angles could either be
- angle NOP = angle NML
- angle NPO = angle NLM
so we have a choice on which to pick. The pairing angle NOP = angle NML is not listed in the answer choices, but angle NPO = angle NLM is listed as choice B.
Saying angle NLM = angle LMN is not useful because those two angles are part of the same triangle. The two angles must be in separate triangles to be able to tie the triangles together.
We would use a rigid transformation to have angle NPO move to angle NLM, or vice versa through the use of a rotation and a translation.
Answer:
(3,-3)
y= -3
x= 3
Step-by-step explanation:
5x+2y=9
2x-3y=15
solve the equation
x=9/5-2/5y
2x-3y=15
substitute the value of x into an equation
2(9/5-2/5y)-3y=15
distribute
18/5-4/5y-3y=15
subtract -4/5 to -3
18/5-19/5y=15
subtract 18/5 from both sides
-19/5=57/5
divide both sides by -19/5
y= -3
substitute the value of y into an equation
x=9/5-2/5(-3)
distribute
x=9/5+6/5
add 9/5 to 6/5
x=3
--------
(3,-3)
--------
Answer:
1) There are two definitions Charlotte came up with to define the quantity:
• Number of new subscribers divided by number of posts
• Number of new subscribers divided by number of words
2) No. The definitions have opposite results
