I actually do think it is a
Answer:
The payment may encourage her to give the game a more positive review than normal.
Explanation:
When people are sponsored or paid by certain companies they usually give a review, and this review is of course, going to be positive. Because of this you could assume that she will give a review that may not be what she actually thinks, or that it may be overly positive.
After heavily reviewing the question i think the answer is kind C.
The author is clearly not a fan of pesticides. This is shown by her word choice. For example, she calls the use of chemical pestides unfortunate and calls them "weapons". She continues to say they have caused horrific damage to the ecosystem. All of the words, like unfortunately, weapons, and horrific help lead the reader to believe that the author does not like the use of pesticides against insects.
Maybe and most probably my little brother is imagining he's a flying feather dancer, like the ones we saw swinging high up from a pole on the Virgin's birthday.