Answer:
1.
"The Dutch had no clear laws defining or regulating slavery in the early 1600s. It was unclear what rights enslaved people might have or how they might become free. In this ambiguous situation, Maria Van Angola and others used several strategies to secure rights and freedom for themselves and their families, including legal action, church membership, and control of land."
According to the text, it had no laws defining/regulating slavery at the time, making it unclear what rights they had. Even if they faced issues, they would still - in all technicality - be able to marry, own property, or petition for their own freedom.
2.
The benefits of owning land was an important part of being a freeholder. This means you would have small land grants and political rights freedom.
"Owning land meant more than a farm--it was a key to status as a “freeholder” with political rights. Listed among the original owners of small farms was a woman called “Marycke” who may have been Maria Van Angola. Over the next 19 years, 22 more emancipated people received small land grants as well, including Maria’s husband, Anthony Portuguese, in 1645."
Not sure if these are right!! Just a small guess, I'm not doing a lesson related to this. I just needed some points. Have a nice day, stay safe! :'}
Explanation:
Answer:
C) both are tied to nonverbal communication
Explanation:
edgeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
The column statues depicting members of the French royal family
Burgoyne's plan revolved around an invasion of 8,000 British<span> troops from Canada, who would move southward through </span>New<span> York by way of Lake Champlain and the Mohawk River, taking the Americans by surprise. ... As Burgoyne's army marched south, Patriot militia circled north, cutting the </span>British<span> supply line.</span>
Answer:
On the Yellow River basin
Explanation:
