Answer:
B) proportional
Explanation:
In the case of the proportional tax structure the marginal tax rate should be equivalent to the average tax rate without considering the high level of taxable income or low level of taxable income
Therefore in the given case, the tax structure should be proportional
hence, the correct option is B
And, the same is to be considered
Answer: Decrease government revenue and decrease deadweight loss from the tax.
Explanation:
Decrease gov rev and decrease deadweight loss from the tax.
At AB, the government revenue will be:
= Quantity × Tax rate
= 1 × 5
= 5
The deadweight loss will be:
Deadweight Loss= 0.5 × Change in quantity × Change in Price
= 0.5 × (9-4) × (2-1)
= 0.5 × 5 × 1
= 2.5
At CD,
the government revenue will be:
= 1.5 × 2.5
= 3.75
The deadweight loss will be:
= 0.5 × (7.5-5) × (2-1.5)
= 0.5 × 2.5 × 0.5
= 0.625
Based on the calculation above, both the government revenue and the deadweight loss decreases.
Answer:
Explanation:
$10,000 to start with.
From USD to pound - (GBP/USD = 1.62). Pounds = 10,000 * (1/1.62) = GBP 6,172.84
From GBP to NZD - (GBP/NZD = 2.95). NZD = 6,172.84 * 2.95 = NZD 18,209.88
From NZD to USD - (NZD/USD = 0.55). USD = 18,209.88 * 0.55 = USD 10,015.43
$10.015.43>$10,000
Profit from implementing the strategy is 10,015.43-10,000 = $15.43
Answer:
Savings in additional cost as result of making $154,350.00
Explanation:
The relevant costs for this decision would be the variable cost of production and the external cost of purchase.
Unit variable cost of internal production
= 10.80 + 9.80 + 4.10 = $24.7
Variable cost of making ( $24.7 × 49,000) = 1,210,300.00
Variable cost of Buying ($27.85 × 49,000) = <u>1,364,650.00</u>
Savings in additional cost as result of making <u> 154,350.00</u>
Note that the fixed cost is irrelevant for the purpose of the make or buy decision . This is so because they would be incurred either way. Hence, they are not to be considered for the analysis
Answer:
6.06%
Explanation:
The computation of the rate of return is shown below:
Given that
NPER = 20 years
PV = ($280,000 - $80,000) = $200,000
PMT = $0
FV = $75,000 × PVIFA factor at 10% for 21 years
= $75,000 × 8.6487
= $648,652.50
The following formula should be applied
= RATE(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;TYPE)
The present value comes in negative
After applying the above formula, the rate of return is 6.06%
