A prominent theme in Rowlandson's narrative (and Puritan writing in
general) is the sense of fear and revulsion she expresses in regards to
the wilderness. When taken captive after the attack on Lancaster,
Rowlandson was forced to face a threatening environment and endure the
treatment of her Native American captors, people whom she refers to as
"barbarous creatures," "murderous wretches" "heathen," "ravenous
beasts," and "hell-hounds."
So you can "read in between the lines" so to say, Teachers want you to re-read what you have read to develop a deeper understanding.
The review of the argument of the writer is as follows:
- He makes use of the bandwagon fallacy when he talks about the statistics of people who said Daylight Savings has made them less productive.
- The argument would have been more convincing if he had made use of good supporting details.
<h3>What is an Argument?</h3>
This refers to the use of words and logic in order to convince a person about a given perspective or position on a particular topic.
Hence, we can see that the writer makes an argument to abolish Daylight Savings and tries to be forceful about it, without the use of proper supporting details.
He does not include the source of the research that talks about the 88% of workers who said Daylight Savings reduced their productivity, and he also made use of the bandwagon fallacy.
Read more about bandwagon fallacy here:
brainly.com/question/1058000
#SPJ1
