Question

Two candidates are running for office in the state senate. During a debate, the candidates say the following: Candidate A: "People are responsible for one another. We will all benefit if everyone gives their fair share. My opponent, Candidate B, doesn't really care about people." Candidate B: "Individual responsibility is of primary importance. We will create jobs and grow the economy by cutting taxes. My opponent, Candidate A, is a bit naive and inexperienced." Given these statements, evaluate how likely it would be for each candidate to be in favor of government-funded health care. Candidate A would be probably be opposed to government-funded health care. Candidate B would probably be in favor of it. Both candidates would probably be in favor of government-funded health care. Both candidates would probably be opposed to government-funded health care. Candidate A would probably be in favor of government-funded health care. Candidate B would be probably be opposed to it.

Answer 1

Looking at the information, candidate A would likely be in favor of government-funded health care. Candidate B would  be probably be opposed to it.

How to identify the motivations of a political candidate?

The analysis of a political debate is an essential tool to understand the proposal of each politician, especially when their ideas are refuted, thus helping the voter in the best comparison between government proposals and candidate choice.

Therefore, in the debate of the issue it is possible to better understand the position of candidates A and B in relation to responsibilities, leading to a greater probability of identifying a possible action of each in a situation.

Find out more about political debate here:

brainly.com/question/18038622

#SPJ1