All categories

2 years ago

Firestone owns its manufacturing sites as well as retail stores that sell its tires. Firestone exemplifies a(n)

1 answer:

katrin2010 [14]2 years ago

5 0

Firestone exemplifies a corporate distribution system by owning its manufacturing sites as well as retail stores that sell its tires.

<h3>What is corporate distribution system?</h3>

A corporate system is where a distribution channel owns all of the others by combining distribution channel under the leadership of a single business.

A corporate distribution system keeps track of its manufacturers', wholesalers', and retailers' procedures, finances, and deadlines. They are in charge of the whole process of manufacturing.

Hence, Firestone exemplifies a corporate distribution system by owning its manufacturing sites as well as retail stores that sell its tires.

Learn more about corporate distribution system here: brainly.com/question/14326246

You might be interested in

. Determine the receivables turnover ratio and average days sales in receivables for the current year. (Use 365 days a year. Do

Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

The question is incomplete, find complete question in the attached.

The receivables turnover for the current year is 9.02 times while average days sales in receivable is 41 days

Explanation:

The formula for computing receivables turnover ratio is given as:

Net credit sales/average accounts receivable,where average receivables is the opening plus closing receivables divided by two.

Net credit sales=$35,657

Average receivables =($3495+$4415)/2=$3955

Receivable turnover ratio=$35657/$3955

=9.02

Average days sales in receivable=number of days in the year/receivable turnover ratio

Average days sales in receivable=365/9.02

=40.47 days approx 41 days

The average days sales in receivable implies the average number of days it takes receivables to settle their accounts

Download xlsx

7 0

3 years ago

A study finds that the noise from airplanes is harmful; hence, the government imposes a $20 tax on the sale of every airplane. T

allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

Decrease

$200

$190

$180

Explanation:

The question isn't complete. Here is the full question:

A study finds that the noise from airplanes is harmful; hence, the government imposes a $20 tax on the sale of every airplane. This amount accurately accounts for the external cost of the noise pollution. Before the corrective tax, airplane tickets regularly sold for $190. After the tax is in place, the market price for airplane tickets rises to $200.

The quantity of airplane tickets sold will

The socially optimal price of airplane tickets is

The private market price is

A firm selling airplane tickets receives after it pays the tax

The noise from the airplanes constitute negative externality.

Tax levied on negative externality is known as pigouvian tax.

As a result of the tax, the price of tickets increases and this would reduce the quantity of tickets demanded for according to the law of demand. According to the law of demand, the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded and the lower the price, the higher the quantity demanded.

The social optimal price is the price of the ticket after the tax accounting for the externality has been added to price. The social optimal price is $200.

The private market price is the price before the taxes: $190.

The amount received by firms = $200 - $20 = $180

I hope my answer helps you

8 0

3 years ago

A significant summer drought takes place in several states, including lowa, Nebraska, Illinois, Minnesota, Indiana, and others.

viva [34]

I wanna say the answer is D it sounds the safest

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The table below presents the average and marginal cost of producing cheeseburgers per hour at a roadside diner.

Butoxors [25]

Answer:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is falling and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is rising.

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is rising and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is at a minimum.

Explanation:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is falling and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is rising.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average total cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is falling.

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the marginal cost of production is rising.

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is rising and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is at a minimum.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 70 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is rising.

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of cheeseburger production at quantities of 50 and 60 cheeseburgers per hour are equal and the lowest on the table, this implies that the average total cost of cheeseburger production is at a minimum at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour.

7 0

3 years ago

Sonia creates tests for judging product safety and advises companies about how to reduce harm from use or misuse of the product.

NISA [10]

Answer:

D) Product safety Engineer

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago