'Fair' is really subjective, anyone will have their own opionion.
But i think the best way to define fair is if the tax structure give the same amount of weight throughout all economic classes
If i can replace the federal income tax structure, i would just give a straight percentage of amount to all economic classes, without anyway to cut with 'tax deductible tricks', like 20 % of annual income to all classes of economy. I
There are four main types of distribution channels;
1) Manufacturer > Wholesaler > Retailer > Consumer
2) Manufacturer > Wholesaler> Consumer
3) Manufacturer > Retailer > Consumer
4) Manufacturer > Consumer
Therefore the most likely answer here is option C
Producer to Wholesaler to Consumer
Answer:
DeBondt and Thaler (1985) found that the poorest-performing stocks in one time period experienced <em>good</em> performance in the following period and that the best-performing stocks in one time period experienced <em>poor</em> performance in the following time period.
Explanation:
DeBondt and Thaler carried out a study that examined stocks of 35 worst and best performing firms over a previous five-year period.The study showed that over the following three-year period, the firms that were previously performing poorly performed better than the former best performing firms, by an average of 25%.This reversal in the fortunes of stocks of firms in the following period is called the Reversal Effect.
Answer: A. a downward-sloping labor demand curve.
Explanation:
If the marginal product of labor is diminishing then that means that for every extra worker hired, less products are made than the last worker. As a result of this, companies will not want to pay high wages to workers because they would be bringing in less revenue when hired.
This will cause a downward-sloping labor demand curve that shows that as more workers are hired, the company would like to pay less wages because each new worker is only producing less than the last worker.
