1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
daser333 [38]
2 years ago
6

Historical revisionism is the reinterpretation of historical events based

Social Studies
1 answer:
makvit [3.9K]2 years ago
8 0

Historic revisionism includes revisiting the sources of a historic document or length with a unique attitude or new information that would adjust how we see it.

<h3>What is Historical revisionism?</h3>

Historical revisionism is the method via way of means of which the ancient record, the records of the society, as understood in its collective memory, constantly accounts for new information and interpretations of the activities which might be usually understood as records.

This manner of revisiting records has both advantageous and negative aspects.

Hence, Historic revisionism includes revisiting the sources of a historic document or length with a unique attitude or new information that would adjust how we see it.

learn more about Historic revisionism here:

brainly.com/question/8862527

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Why was the reapportionment act of 1929 p<br> Passed
AfilCa [17]
Reapportionment Act of 1929 was passed in order to put in place a permanent method for dividing a constant 435 in the US house of representative in accordance with census. According to the constitutions, each state was supposed to have one representative in the house of representative. As the population of US increase, it becomes difficult how to choose members of house of representative, hence this law.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct boxes. Similarity Between United States and Roman Republic Difference Between United States and Roman Republi
s2008m [1.1K]

The Similarity between both government are:

  • The government is made up of three branches. The three branches are legislative, judicial, and executive

  • The both government could use a veto to cancel an action. Veto means "I forbid".

  • The United States only have the President to veto. In a Roman republic only the two consoles have power to veto.

  • There was a system of checks and balances in both government. That means no branch in the government can take all of the power.

The Difference between both government are:

  • The legal codes are different. In a Roman republic all laws are written in the 12 tables while in the USA we write our laws in a constitution.

  • The judicial branches are different because in the USA and Romam Republic.

Learn more from

brainly.com/question/25395310

5 0
3 years ago
Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) _____.
BARSIC [14]
Is used to treat acne
reduces pain and fever
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the three plans of the convention was the one that was approved? Why was this plan finally chosen?
Nataly_w [17]

Answer: When delegates to the Constitutional Convention began to assemble at Philadelphia in May 1787, they quickly resolved to replace rather than merely revise the Articles of Confederation. Although James Madison is known as the “father of the constitution,” George Washington’s support gave the convention its hope of success. Division of power between branches of government and between the federal and state governments, slavery, trade, taxes, foreign affairs, representation, and even the procedure to elect a president were just a few of the contentious issues.  Diverging plans, strong egos, regional demands, and states’ rights made solutions difficult. Five months of debate, compromise, and creative strategies produced a new constitution creating a federal republic with a strong central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. Ten months of public and private debate were required to secure ratification by the minimum nine states. Even then Rhode Island and North Carolina held out until after the adoption of a Bill of Rights.

7 0
3 years ago
Identify and explain two factors that led to the formation of squatter settlements in megacities in developing countries.
castortr0y [4]

Answer:

Lack of jobs and expensive housing

Explanation:

Rural to Urban migration is very influential in most megacities settlements and this will lead to squatter settlements. For example State like Lagos which is Nigeria is one of the most populous State in the world due to its high population, Rural to Urban migration is very common in this part and the more the population the more pressure for the Government to build infrastructure for employment so in that process there will be lack of jobs and even for them to afford normal apartment will be difficult therefore it will lead to squatter settlement for them.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The major environmental issues in Central America, South America, and the Caribbean include all the following except _____.fores
    12·1 answer
  • What Persian architectural feature is a large vaulted chamber with a pointed-arch opening, first used as an entrance to royal re
    10·1 answer
  • The economic policy of the new nations was the theory of .
    5·2 answers
  • What is moral hazard?
    8·1 answer
  • Can I get help with these 3 questions?
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • Generally, Latin Americans are a blend of which of the following as a result of the Columbian Exchange and the Triangular Trade?
    14·2 answers
  • What were some basic beliefs of some early Christians
    10·2 answers
  • Why was communication between settlements difficult in Ancient Greece
    13·1 answer
  • which swiss psychologist conceptualized word associations as revealing information about psychopathology and personality types?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!