The answer is, To argue for, there's the obvious, which is that the colonists didn't
like their lack of voice within British Parliament. They also didn't
like how Britain was treating other colonies, what would become Canada
for instance, with similar laws and codes seen in the US colonies. You
could also argue that it was a more financial decision, as the taxes
placed upon the colonies and the restrictions on trade were hurting
American businesses. Honestly, an argument combining the two would
probably be more rounded.
Their power in the family was increased, as people who performed foot binding were known to be active socially with others. None of the other options would work in this situation.
It untwgnwfnagnagngagnsgmzggmzv zv vG zv zv San V vnggmaanf gamgG.MganfafnaafnafnfnNfNfaafnnafafnfnafanafnafnafnsed to bagnatnzv vzvnCcnDbafnafnafnsggmsgnsgnFnafnatnfnatjfabD
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "-More people acquire jobs and earn wages; -Workers receive higher wages." <span>these are the items that describe why consumption might increase during periods of economic growth</span>
The Magma Cart was written first
