Answer:
a non-cooperative game strategy, where participants independently choose their strategy to maximize their payoffs.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about Bob, who attended the university football game last week . At the opening kickoff, the crowd stood up. Bob therefore had to stand up as well to see the game. In this case, Bob was participating in a non-cooperative game of strategy, where participants collectively choose their strategy to maximize their joint payoffs. Non-cooperative game strategy can be regarded as the rational ways economic agent relate with each other so that their goals can be achieved. In this game both the available strategies as well as the outcome from various choices will be listed.
You must consider both consequences, the positive and the negative. Then you must think of a way that you will have a win-win situation or just do the compromising to be able to solve the problem and have a faster solving process.
As mentioned the alley was dark. So it is possible that there was someone else at the crime scene and the witness is mistaken to be that man. It is quite possible to see someone in the dark and mistaken them for someone else. As the alley was dark, eye witness testimony is not reliable.
The eyewitness doesn’t have any evidence whereas my client has an alibi and he was not present at the crime scene. Even if my client was standing near the boy it doesn’t prove that he killed someone.
