1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
HACTEHA [7]
2 years ago
5

Give one example each of an appeal to logos, an appeal to pathos, and establishing ethos.

English
1 answer:
AleksandrR [38]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

  1. Logos appeal to the audience's reasoning. For example, I build up a logical argument by presenting facts that I know everyone will agree with, or reason with.
  2. Ethos appeal to the speaker's status, which may make the audience trust them more. For example, I am speaking on a podium, and I say "Because [my profession], this product is [positive adjective] to be used."
  3. Pathos appeal completely to emotions, making the audience feel a certain way. For instance, someone tries to convince me to give them dog treats because they have an adorable puppy.
You might be interested in
Scott loves to play board games. For his informative speech, he chooses to discuss cribbage.Cribbage is an example of a ________
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "B": topic.

Explanation:

Topics are the central theme of studies, researches, books or speeches. A topic represents the main idea that is intended to be provided and from where all additional points of view depart. Usually, authors expose topics that are of their interest and that could be of interest to others.

4 0
3 years ago
How-to's, encyclopedias, dictionaries, and foreign language books are all
strojnjashka [21]

Answer:

D. Explain something

Explanation:

These are all examples of authors that are trying to explain something. Show how something is done or how something is correctly used.

I hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
What was the main flaw in the sepreme courts reasoning in Plessy v. Ferguson
devlian [24]
N Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 "providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races." The law, which required that all passenger railways provide separate cars for blacks and whites, stipulated that the cars be equal in facilities, banned whites from sitting in black cars and blacks in white cars (with exception to "nurses attending children of the other race"), and penalized passengers or railway employees for violating its terms. 

<span>Homer Plessy, the plaintiff in the case, was seven-eighths white and one-eighth black, and had the appearance of a white man. On June 7, 1892, he purchased a first-class ticket for a trip between New Orleans and Covington, La., and took possession of a vacant seat in a white-only car. Duly arrested and imprisoned, Plessy was brought to trial in a New Orleans court and convicted of violating the 1890 law. He then filed a petition against the judge in that trial, Hon. John H. Ferguson, at the Louisiana Supreme Court, arguing that the segregation law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which forbids states from denying "to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," as well as the Thirteenth Amendment, which banned slavery. </span>

<span>The Court ruled that, while the object of the Fourteenth Amendment was to create "absolute equality of the two races before the law," such equality extended only so far as political and civil rights (e.g., voting and serving on juries), not "social rights" (e.g., sitting in a railway car one chooses). As Justice Henry Brown's opinion put it, "if one race be inferior to the other socially, the constitution of the United States cannot put them upon the same plane." Furthermore, the Court held that the Thirteenth Amendment applied only to the imposition of slavery itself. </span>

<span>The Court expressly rejected Plessy's arguments that the law stigmatized blacks "with a badge of inferiority," pointing out that both blacks and whites were given equal facilities under the law and were equally punished for violating the law. "We consider the underlying fallacy of [Plessy's] argument" contended the Court, "to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it." </span>

<span>Justice John Marshall Harlan entered a powerful -- and lone -- dissent, noting that "in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens." </span>

<span>Until the mid-twentieth century, Plessy v. Ferguson gave a "constitutional nod" to racial segregation in public places, foreclosing legal challenges against increasingly-segregated institutions throughout the South. The railcars in Plessy notwithstanding, the black facilities in these institutions were decidedly inferior to white ones, creating a kind of racial caste society. However, in the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the "separate but equal" doctrine was abruptly overturned when a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that segregating children by race in public schools was "inherently unequal" and violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Brown provided a major catalyst for the civil rights movement (1955-68), which won social, not just political and civil, racial equality before the law. After four decades, Justice Harlan's dissent became the law of the land. Following Brown, the Supreme Court has consistently ruled racial segregation in public settings to be unconstitutional. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Who is the author of Kelvin Doe
Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

Sierra Leonean inventor

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List 10 differences between the novel and the 2004 film for Around the world in 80 days?
dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

Around the World in 80 Days is a 2004 American action adventure comedy film based on Jules Verne's 1873 novel of the same name and remake of the movie of the same name of 1956. It stars Jackie Chan, Steve Coogan and Cécile de France. The film is set in the nineteenth century and centers on Phileas Fogg (Coogan), here reimagined as an eccentric inventor, and his efforts to circumnavigate the globe in 80 days. During the trip, he is accompanied by his Chinese valet, Passepartout (Chan). For comedic reasons, the film intentionally deviated wildly from the novel and included a number of anachronistic elements. With production costs of about $110 million and estimated marketing costs of $30 million, it earned $24 million at the U.S. box office and $72 million worldwide, making it a box office failure.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read the paragraph. What would be the best way to correctly edit the underlined sentence?
    7·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from act 5, scene 5, of Julius Caesar.
    7·2 answers
  • Augustine may have understood the shift away from paganism and toward Christianity particularly well because _____.
    10·1 answer
  • How do I get better at English, Its almost like I cant learn.
    8·1 answer
  • True or False: Writers use vivid language
    10·1 answer
  • How would you restate prospero's words in Modern English when he refers to the green sour ringlets
    7·1 answer
  • 12. He was dirty and starving and bitten and hurt and lonely and ugly and afraid and so completely
    8·2 answers
  • HEADLINE:<br> AUTHOR:<br> DATE PUBLISHED:
    9·1 answer
  • Write a research-based argumentative essay for or against free education for children worldwide.
    15·1 answer
  • Interpret this scene as if you were the director of the play. How would you represent the scene on stage? Give details for your
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!