Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

15

The Phoenix Suns decide to increase their ticket prices for next season. We might expect revenue will rise due to the higher pri

ces revenues might fall, given that basketball is a luxury revenues will rise, given that Phoenix is a large city revenues will fall, given that the Suns operate a monopoly.

1 answer:

vaieri [72.5K]2 years ago

5 0

We might expect revenue will rise given that Phoenix is a large city.

<h3>What is a revenue?</h3>

This refers to the income generated from normal business operations which are calculated by average sales price * the number of units sold

Because Phoenix Suns decide to increase their ticket prices for next season, then, we might expect revenue will rise given that Phoenix is a large city.

Therefore, the Option B is correct.

Read more about revenue

<em>brainly.com/question/4618859</em>

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Near an ocean beach, a high-rise building is being constructed that will block the scenic view of the ocean by the residents of

Snowcat [4.5K]

The correct answer is can be resolved by the owners themselves through private bargaining.

According to the Coase Theorem, where there is a conflict between property rights, the parties involved can bargain or negotiate terms that
fully reflect the actual costs and underlying values of the relevant property rights, leading to the most efficient conclusion.
When negotiating is costly, Coase's theorem fails. A fair resolution cannot be reached if negotiation is not possible.

What are the conditions of Coase Theorem?

The two requirements for an effective market solution are full property rights and no (or minimal) transaction costs, according to the Coase theorem.

By transferring property rights, one can occasionally approximate these conditions and establish a market for the externality.

Learn more about Coase Theorem brainly.com/question/14837886

#SPJ4

8 0

2 years ago

The Harris Company is decentralized, and divisions are considered investment centers. Harris has one division that manufactures

SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer:

Explanation:

Sales Revenue:

Proceeds from sales of Chair Division = 800*85=68000

Proceeds from sales of Cusion Division = 800*32=25600

Transfer to chair division from cusion division = 800*32 = 25600

Total Sales Revenue = 119200

Variable Cost - VC

VC Chair Division (800*42) = (33600)

VC Cusion Division (1600*13)=(20800)

Transfer cost = (800*13)=(10400)

Total Contribution = 119200-33600-20800-10400=54400

6 0

3 years ago

g 4. The price of a home is $197,000. The bank requires 20% down payment and four points at closing. The cost of the home is fin

Molodets [167]

Answer:

a. $39,400

b. $157,600

c. $6,304

Explanation:

a. Down payment

Bank requires 20% down payment

= 20% * 197,000

= $39,400

b. Mortgage amount

= Price of house - down payment

= 197,000 - 39,400

= $157,600

c. Amount at 4 points:

= Mortgage * 4%

= 157,600 * 4%

= $6,304

4 0

3 years ago

Sweet Sue Foods has bonds outstanding with a coupon rate of 5.50 percent paid semiannually and sell for $1,917.12. The bonds hav

Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

Current yield=5.74%

Explanation:

Calculation for the current yield for these bonds

Current yield = (.055× $2,000)/$1,917.12

Current yield =$110/$1,917.12

Current yield=0.0574*100

Current yield=5.74%

Therefore the current yield for these bonds will be 5.74%

7 0

3 years ago

Instructions: Please make sure that you show all your work when solving the problems. Feel free to make any assumptions whenever

My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

Explanation:

From the given information:

The current price = $\dfrac{Dividend(D_o) \times (1+ Growth \ rate) }{\text{Cost of capital -Growth rate}}$

$15 = \dfrac{0.50 \times (1+ Growth rate)}{8\%-Growth rate}$

$15 \times (8 -Growth \ rate) = 0.50 +(0.50 \times growth \ rate)$

$1.20 - (15 \times Growth \ rate) = 0.50 + (0.50 \times growth \ rate)$

$0.70 = (15 \times growth \ rate) \\ \\ Growth \ rate = \dfrac{0.70}{15.50} \\ \\ Growth \ rate = 0.04516 \\ \\ Growth \ rate \simeq 4.52\% \\ \\$

2. The value of the stock

Calculate the earnings at the end of 5 years:

$Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend \ payout \ ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%} \\ \\ = \$1.42857$

$Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$2.51763$

Terminal value year 5 = $\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}$

$=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+0.04516)}{8\%-0.04516}$

=$75.526

Discount all potential future cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

$\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 +Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no\ of\ years} }$

$+ \dfrac{Terminal\ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years}} \Bigg)$

$\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$75.526}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg )$

$\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$75.526}{1.4693} \bigg)$

=$ 54.1945

As a result, the analysts value the stock at $54.20, which is below their own estimates.

3. The value of the stock

Calculate the earnings at the end of 5 years:

$Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend payout ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%}\\ \\ = \$1.42857$

$Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$2.51763 \\ \\$

Terminal value year 5 = $\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)\times dividend \ payout \ ratio}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}$

$=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+ 7 \%) \times 20\%}{8\%-7\%}$

=$53.8773

Discount all potential cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

$\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 + Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no \ of\ years} }+ \dfrac{Terminal \ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years }} \bigg)$

$\implies \bigg( \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$53.8773}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg)$

$\implies \bigg (\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$53.8773}{1.4693} \bigg)$

=$39.460

As a result, the price is $39.460, and the other strategy would raise the value of the shareholders. Not this one, since paying a 100% dividend would result in a price of $54.20, which is higher than the current price.

Notice that the third question depicts the situation after 5 years, but the final decision will be the same since we are discounting in current terms. If compounding is used, the future value over 5 years is just the same as the first choice, which is the better option.

The presumption in the second portion is that after 5 years, the steady growth rate would be the same as measured in the first part (1).

8 0

3 years ago