Answer:
pa brainliest answer po follow me follow back and pa heart po thankssssss
Explanation:
no one would have believed in
he last years of the nineteenth century that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man’s and yet as mortal as his own; that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutnised and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinise the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water. With infinite complacency men went to and fro over this globe about their little affairs, serene in their assurance of their empire over matter. It is possible that the infusoria under the microscope do the same. No one gave a thought to the older worlds of space as sources of human danger, or thought of them only to dismiss the idea of life upon them as impossible or improbable.
<h3>H.G. Wells, The War of the Worlds</h3>
Answer:
The function of the underlined noun clause is direct object.
Explanation:
A noun clause is a dependent clause that acts as a noun. That is, they can act as subjects, direct objects, indirect objects, predicate nominatives, or objects of a preposition. In this case, the noun clause is "whatever the cafeteria staff has decided to cook" and it functions as the direct object of the transitive verb <em>to eat. </em>
Explanation:
allegory means the story having 2 levels of meanings.
