Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given question.
We can write the null hypothesis & the alternative hypothesis as:
Null hypothesis:
![\mathbf{H_o: \mu \leq 6}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7BH_o%3A%20%5Cmu%20%5Cleq%206%7D)
Alternative hypothesis:
![\mathbf{H_{a}:\mu >6}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7BH_%7Ba%7D%3A%5Cmu%20%3E6%7D)
From above, let's think about the type I error we could make and the type II error we could make.
<u>Type I error:</u>
The type I error at the null hypothesis showcases that the snow level is at 6 inches or below 6 inches, but we falsely concluded that the snow level is high above sea level.
<u>Type II error:</u>
Here, the snow level is literally above 6 inches, hence, we failed to conclude that the snow level is above 6 inches.
Thus, the consequences of the above analysis showcase that type II error has higher severe consequences because it may result in a situation that may endanger the passengers' safety.
Answer:
50
Step-by-step explanation:
because the total number of traingle =180 so we have 15 and 35 which equal 50 and the inside angle = 130 and x = 50
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(f.g)(x) = (x² - 2x + 3) (x³ - 4)
= x²* (x³ - 4) - 2x* (x³ - 4) + 3 * (x³ - 4)
= x²*x³ - x²*4 - 2x*x³ - 2x*(-4) + 3*x³ - 3 * 4
= x⁵ - 4x² - 2x⁴ + 8x + 3x³ - 12
= x⁵ - 2x⁴ + 3x³ - 4x² + 8x - 12
There are none.![y=\dfrac{x^{2}+2x-48}{x+8}=\dfrac{(x+8)(x-6)}{x+8}\\\\y=x-6](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%3D%5Cdfrac%7Bx%5E%7B2%7D%2B2x-48%7D%7Bx%2B8%7D%3D%5Cdfrac%7B%28x%2B8%29%28x-6%29%7D%7Bx%2B8%7D%5C%5C%5C%5Cy%3Dx-6)
The expression describes a straight line with a hole at x=-8 where it is undefined.
20 chocolate chip, 15 peanut butter. I don't know how to show that on a diagram, but this can at least get you started